Councillor Manova - page 9

New comment
 

P.S. Dimitar as an easy way to the championship, if you screw MM on Equi, he would have ended up with more than 60,000 and it is already prizes.

P.S.S. If I notice that someone has figured out the idea, put it out in the open =) (I thought there are more intelligent people here).

 
Sys15975382:
P.S. Dimitar took the Championship too lightly as if he had attached MM to Equi, he would have eventually gained more than 60 000 points and that is already prizes.

I think that's the situation here - if I take someone else's money I have to be as sure as I am in mine - now about Manov's strategy

Yes, the problem with oversleeping - and the entry is made where it happens - I think as a marker we need to take a parabolic (the indicator is so-so indicator - but to collect statistics on the instrument can

and then use it as a bailout of a profitable position

tolerate leverage and work with shares (you need to share!)


By the way, it is possible to close a profitable position partially using the accumulated statistics from a parabolic (splitting of parts, most probably, by a parabola)

 
Sys15975382:

P.S. Dimitar as an easy way to the championship, if you screw MM on Equi, he would have ended up with more than 60,000 and it is already prizes.

P.S.S. If I notice that someone has figured out the idea, put it out in the open =) (I thought there were more creative people here).

The only thing you need to think about is to get the right signals when you have an owl - just go ahead and post it.

If he likes it, he can do it again - he just does not care about it.


 
By the way, in the tester there is no such thing as time on the balance of funds/balance sheet chart, although it would be possible to see the time of drawdown here
 
EvgeTrofi:

I'm puzzled as to how Manov's advisor got past the 2010 championship casting. It has been leaking since January with standard settings.

Rewrote the EA according to your comments, but the point remains the same. Overshooting and Leverage.


Symbol EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period 5 Minutes (M5) 2010.02.10 00:00 - 2010.12.28 00:00
Model Control points (very rough method, results cannot be taken into account)
Parameters MagicNumber=363111459; BeginStep=1100; NeedProfit=120; MaxLoss=10000000; MaxCount=20; Lot=0.1; OnlyOneSide=true;
Bars in history 66369 Modelled ticks 3302962 Simulation quality n/a
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 6562.11 Total profit 19507.26 Total loss -12945.15
Profitability 1.51 Expected payoff 11.37
Absolute drawdown 6901.36 Maximum drawdown 11127.06 (46.73%) Relative drawdown 76.91% (10320.90)
Total trades 577 Short positions (% win) 287 (85.37%) Long positions (% win) 290 (78.28%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 472 (81.80%) Loss trades (% of all) 105 (18.20%)
Largest profitable trade 172.71 losing transaction -520.56
Average profitable deal 41.33 losing transaction -123.29
Maximum number continuous wins (profit) 34 (1230.64) Continuous losses (loss) 20 (-7148.32)
Maximum Continuous Profit (number of wins) 1230.64 (34) Continuous loss (number of losses) -7148.32 (20)
Average continuous winnings 13 continuous loss 3



separately tested the site 20.09.2010 to 25.09.2010 and there were offers -

Levels by levels - but allow only one trade in one candle (the case where there is no hurry)

I don't think we can cheat the market, so at least the tester

21.09.2010 in one 5 min candle 44 pips

 

evgetrofi didn't come close to the idea, it's very simple and you're getting wise.

I've read all 9 threads =) you don't understand the system at all.)

I'm not sorry and $200 is a small amount =) just want you to think =) as soon as you figure it out, I'll post the owl.

 
Sys15975382:

evgetrofi didn't come close to the idea, it's very simple and you're getting wise.

I've read all 9 threads =) you don't understand the system at all.)

I'm not sorry and $200 is a small amount =) just want you to think =) as soon as you figure it out, I'll post the owl.

let me tell you.

If we are right on the trend, we close with a fixed amount.

if we missed - we open a counter-trend at predetermined levels (along the parabola) with a fixed lot, but no more than 20 lots and close on a pullback with a predetermined profit, or we wait and wait until the market closes in the positive (this is the main drawback, by the way)


brilliantly simple - but boring

 

It's the same for me!
What's the difference? No insults, please explain.

 
EvgeTrofi:

It's the same for me!
What's the difference? No insults, please explain.

it's sys15975382 who insists that your strategy is wrong and whatever.

 
Sys15975382:

Why guess if you don't know how the fuck his owl works =)))

I got it back in November, I have an Expert Advisor for MT4 which trades exactly the same. (tested it on the same period of time). I would not use all 12 pairs, 2 are not suitable for it at all (he says so himself) and 2 give tiny returns. For the other 8, here are the owl reports I have in hand: http: //zalil.ru/30429384

Average return per month without MM is 143%. It has a potential risk of plummeting, pay attention at the end of the competition the difference between balance and equi exceeded $10,000 (was about 13,000) and did not level out until the end. but according to the Asian method it can and should be used, which I will do in March.

The Expert Advisor has been tested and tested on the real, I will show you the stats.


In your test on EURUSD, the drawdown is 72.06%. Is that OK? Why are you testing from 2010.04.14 and not from the beginning of the year? Does it leak before that?
1234567891011
New comment