What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 46

New comment
 

In general, the question in the sjba was not posed correctly in the first place. You should have smoked something to think about it.

It's like asking "what colour is a right angle?".

 
Gentlemen, I propose to come down to earth and, for the time being, confine ourselves to the fact that time is the duration of dynamic processes. But there are also "non-dynamic" processes which we often classify as dynamic, perhaps without understanding, or because, if they are processes, they should not necessarily be dynamic, i.e. they should depend on time. For example, does the process of finding the best ice cream recipe depend on time? At first sight, yes, of course it does, because it will be found after a certain period of time. But, it depends more on the talent of the researcher, his knowledge and experience. Similarly, in the case of Forex, is time a priority?
 
moskitman:

In general, the question in the sjba was not posed correctly in the first place. You should have smoked something to think about it.

It's like asking "what colour is a right angle?".

The question is posed correctly, which gives us an opportunity to debate around the concept of time and try to figure out the role of time in market situations, particularly in the case of forex. Although, in Forex some of the main principles of the market mechanism are missing, like competition. The law of supply and demand also fails due to the lack of information for market participants. Forex is something between a market and chaos. But it's definitely not a market in its broad sense. However, that is a topic for another discussion.
 
yosuf:
Gentlemen, I suggest we come down to earth and, for now, confine ourselves to the fact that, time is the duration of dynamic processes...


No, no, and no.

Time, is the PROPERTY of space to propagate perturbation at a CONTINUOUS rate. It is what makes processes DURABLE.

 
prikolnyjkent:


No, no, and no.

Time, is the PROPERTY of space to propagate perturbation at a CONTINUOUS rate. It is what makes processes CONTINUOUS.

So be it, but don't confuse space with time - they are not the same thing. Perhaps, time exists only in our consciousness, because, in nature, there is no one else and there is no reason to keep track of what is going on in processes, and nature itself has no reason to keep track of what will happen as a result of this or that process. Time is a necessary attribute of cognition of surrounding world by an intelligent being. Moreover, we try to cognize nature by artificially invented methods, ways and even numbers, in particular natural ones, which do not exist in nature.
 
Clearly, the shape of time is a hexagonal bipartite!
 
Zhunko:
Definitely, the shape of time is a six-dimensional dodecahedron!

Laughter is laughter, but your 3.14 ass is upside down... ©

Remember film? It's about the same way three-dimensional spaces change in time: one after the other, one after the other... And what kind of "shape" is this shit? A dodecahedron octagon, for fuck's sake.

 
Zhunko:
Clearly, the shape of time is a hexagonal bipartite!
Being inside an object, we can't judge the shape of the object, apparently that's how we can explain the phenomenon. Oh, I've got it twisted!
 
yosuf:
...Perhaps time exists only in our minds...


The property "to propagate perturbation at a finite speed" exists IN OPPOSITION TO OUR CONSCIOUSNESS.

The velocity was finite BEFORE, it will be finite AFTER.

 
Zhunko:
Clearly, the shape of time is a hexagonal bipartite!

No! The shape of time is a 13-dimensional - One-Dimensional - One-Corner!
1...394041424344454647484950515253...67
New comment