For those who have (are) seriously engaged in co-movement analysis of financial instruments (> 2) - page 26
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
How annoying are you already....
You have no idea what I have to say about being "pestered"... Don't strain yourself, or with our efforts you and I are hindering the topicstarter.
I admire the stamina ( and not only ) of the topicstarter, but if I were him I'd shut up about your forum.
let's still look at the results of spectral analysis of indices and synthetics.
That's more important than your genro "off-topic thoughts"...
There is a specialised branch about this. ;) Imho.
I think Vadim will be able to show what his picture looked like before, and at the moment of flight.
Then the question of flooding will fall away on its own.
Compromising I suggest looking at the same analysis at decision points rather than after...
Vadim - can you roll back your build up to the event?
And show that everything was clear and straightforward by prediction there.
Otherwise, it really does look like flooding, if not worse.
What else is there to show?! I don't get it.... It's all there. It's not my posturing. It's a program that draws the signals it finds. They're the same as in real life. They do not differ in any way.
The signal formed on the 1st bar is drawn at the open price of the bar at zero. The signal strength is even specified there. I am not going to tell you how the signal is calculated and its strength.)
I only put a vertical line (magenta) to show the bar I am looking for. The average chart is not used for calculations here, but even it predetermines the movement at the specified bar.
Where will the price go if 7 lines are down and 3 are up?
What else is there to show?! I don't get it.... It's all there visually. It's not my posturing. It's a program that draws the signals it finds. They're the same as in real life. They do not differ from each other.
The signal formed on the 1st bar is drawn on zero at the opening price of the bar. Even the strength of the signal is indicated there. I will not tell you how the signal is calculated and its strength, otherwise you will understand everything :-))
Only I put a vertical line (magenta) to show the bar I was looking for. The average chart is not used for calculations here, but even it predetermines the movement on the specified bar.
Where will the price go, if 7 lines are directed downwards and 3 upwards?
And what is there to understand - Fourier and the like will perfectly draw the past forecast according to the current data, while at the moment of making a decision it will be exactly the opposite.
So my humble appeal to show the truth and the reaction to it, alas - confirms the maxim about ponts and the like...
Pity.
(
And what is there to understand - Fourier, and others like him, will perfectly draw the past forecast from the data now, and at the time of making a decision - exactly "the other way round".
So my humble appeal to show the truth and the reaction to it, alas - confirms the maxim about ponts and stuff...
Pity.
(
What's that got to do with Fourier? You obviously don't know anything about spectral analysis.
Yeah...
I ' d rather you didn't say anything.
It would be better if you didn't say anything.
You've already found Fourier. What other ways are there?