Randomness of price values - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
From the description it is just one of the linux distributions.
hrenfx: I'm so tired of telling everyone all this...
just like the fact that only pips can be statistically profitable... over a long period of time...
What is the fun and pathos of CentOS? Is it a real-time OS?
From the description it is just one of the linux distributions.
Another very fancy word and you don't even have to know what it means :)
hrenfx: I'm so tired of telling everyone all this...
just like the fact that only pips can be statistically profitable... over a long period of time...
Have you been talking to US hedge fund strategists too? And where is this mushrooming place?
Do they need it? Under such conditions, with a positive expectation of return, they are not required to do anything other than artificially maintain liquidity. .........
+1
Plus unlimited pipsing opportunities (I mean the absence of any opposition from the counterparties).
Under such conditions I myself would consider all "long" strategists to be idiots. And I would pity the shit out of them... it's so uplifting...! :)
--
I think I'll go feel sorry for myself once more.... You too...
;)
Have you been in touch with American hedge fund strategists too? And where is this mushrooming place?
I didn't... just elementary logic - there are no absolute patterns in forex! Price movements are absolute randomness!
But the wave theory, as I've already written, works just as well on a coin flip and a casino ball ... and any random process in nature
i didn't communicate... it's just elementary logic - there are no absolute patterns in forex! the price movement is an absolute randomness!
And the wave theory, as I wrote, works just as well on a coin flip and a casino ball...
You have no elementary logic at all.
Well, you have no elementary logic at all.
I'm fine with that:
pipsar ... to equalize the test with the real test - in the code iTime (.....) =TimeCurrent()
Initial deposit 100.00
Net profit 7023311.00
Total profit 16227263.00
Total loss -9203952.00
Profitability 1.76
Win expectation 6619.52
Absolute drawdown 3.60
Maximum drawdown 518000.00 (11.58%)
Relative drawdown 25.81% (60.40)
Total trades 1061
Short positions (% win) 557 (60.32%)
Long positions (% win) 504 (63.49%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 656 (61.83%)
Losses (% of all) 405 (38.
17%)
Largest
profitable trade 241000.00
losing trade -40000.00
Average
profitable trade 24736.68
losing trade -22725.81
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 14 (923.50)
continuous losses (loss) 5 (-94980.00)
Maximum
continuous gain (number of wins) 466000.00 (10)
continuous loss (number of losses) -160000.00 (4)
Average
continuous loss
I'm fine with it:
pipsar ... to equalise the test with the real test - in the code iTime (.....) =TimeCurrent()
Stirlitz once wrote an EA on mashqs. Optimized it, ran it in the tester - it works. Put it for real - it loses. Optimized it again, ran it in the tester - it works. I tried it again on real - it still loses.
- I should try again, thought Stirlitz after 896th attempt.
Stirlitz once wrote an EA on mash-ups. He optimised it, ran it in the tester - it was making money. Put it for real - it loses. Optimized it again, ran it in the tester - it earns. I tried it again on real - it still loses.
- I should try again, thought Stirlitz after 896th attempt.