Adviser to the whole world - page 14

 
new-rena:

I will be very happy if everything goes well for you. After all, you have to prove that you can trade on indicators. I'm working on it too. This is where I started and I'm going to finish the job I started.
thank you, you too,
If you start with the fact that all indicators follow the price, then the secret of successful trading is not in the indicators, and probably everyone knows that... of course you can't do without indicators, but the secret is not in them...
 
sllawa3:
It is impossible to create a sufficiently profitable system, which sooner or later, when trading it would not plummet the entire deposit without the rest!!! Especially in metatradera where absolutely impossible reliable test!

If you develop it correctly, the result may be quite good. And if you also constantly analyze the previous period, while BUY or -SELL are running, and you set new parameters to your EA... you can work well in a trend.
 
rustein:
thank you, and you too,
if you start with the fact that all indicators follow the price, then the secret to successful trading is not in the indicators, and everyone probably knows that... of course you can't do without indicators, but the secret is not in them...

I corrected the previous comment - take a look.
 
to develop something you need a test !!! on the history ... and on an absolutely reliable one !!! 2 absolutely identical bars on m1 can be absolutely different by the price movement in them !!!
 

If there were a single profitable Expert Advisor in nature (even one person) there would not be any DTs!

it doesn't matter ... in mcl expert or in any other language ...

 
sllawa3:
If there was even one profitable EA in nature (even one person) there would not be any DTs!!!

DT works on spread. What is the spread at night? The Japanese are too greedy.
 
sllawa3:
to develop something you need a test !!! on the history ... and on an absolutely reliable one !!! 2 absolutely identical bars on m1 can be absolutely different by the price movement in them !!!

A test only after it has been created. Right? But the main thing is the idea. That's what I suggested to fight with the whole world.
 
so we can make a logical conclusion: forex is a game above all... (there is no absolute pattern... not even a combination of 100% working) and as in any game, all the attendant attributes are necessary... wins and losses ... bankruptcies and plums ... etc. (Here's how to win big as in the casino is hardly possible!!!)
 
rustein:
thank you, you too,
if you start with the fact that all indicators follow the price, then the secret to successful trading is not in the indicators, and everyone probably knows that... of course you can't do without indicators, but the secret is not in them...

Of course it is. The trend does not follow the indicators. That's why ALL are overdrawn! Market logic is the way to go.
 
sllawa3:
so we can make a completely logical conclusion: forex is a game above all... and as in any game all the accompanying attributes are mandatory... Wins and losses... Wins and losses ... etc. (Just win big as in the casino is unlikely!!!).

I think that Forex is a good idea to make money and involve money in the market. Forex is said to get rich instantly on the spread. Who is losing or vice versa is not important at all. Not everyone can create an exchanger or a bank making money on Bid or Ask, can they?