Probability assessment is purely mathematical - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I meant that his proof boils down to "I (the non-veteran) didn't find it, so the process is completely random
Ahh, that won't do. :(
However, the non-veteran doesn't have to "vent", anyone can try to prove it.
Or maybe, why are we sitting here on this forum at all. What's the point of having a terminal. We could just throw a die or a coin. The dice are funnier, you can roll 10 for especially suspicious traders and, depending on what comes up, call the broker and order him to place an order.
You can just roll the dice
I don't get it with the cube. 5 out of 10 must have negative dots?
plus after 31
I don't get it with the cube. 5 out of 10 must have negative dots?
I have proof to the contrary.
Proof of non-random price behaviour at all? Or are there conditions?
Actually, in the beginning we were talking about the randomness of the price increment, not the price itself, which are two big differences.
Proof of non-random price behaviour at all? Or is there a condition?
I have proof that the market is not random.
faa1947:
Actually, in the beginning it was about the randomness of price increments, not the price itself, and those are two big differences.
How can this be? The increment is random, but the result is non-random?
Actually, in the beginning we were talking about the randomness of the price increment, not the price itself, which are two big differences.
Is increment not part of the behaviour of the price?
I have proof that the market is not random.
and that's two big differences.