A suggestion to the administration - page 26
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
IMHO - everything is simple and you have to act strictly by the rules. The rules must clearly limit the range of what can be interfered with. There is no need to talk about bans yet. :) IMHO - for such moderators it is unnecessary.
So it's clear where to go from here - we need more rules. And we need to start making them now, without having to put them in a special topic. IMHO
Don't even get your hopes up and have any illusions
What election? What rules? Everything is decided. If you don't like it, go back to your Twitter.
In vain you try to negotiate, you'll be swamped with amendments, "laws", requirements to explain and dance to the music on the table
Moderators, you are sober and self-sufficient, no need to listen to anyone, no need to get into a position or it will be endless
Bears, what if we all vote here - and a majority says we need to think again about who will be a moderator? Then what would happen... :)v
Here IMHO - this discussion shows very clearly where we are going. :( So consider that the moderators are still sort of unapproved. It will be easier that way.
DFedor, hello!? Where are the rules? There aren't any. So you are acting outside the scope of your authority. What's the conclusion?
If you read something like these rules . https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://forum.academ.org/index.php?showtopic=246739, you will find that the current rules of the forum have it all, just not written down.
Don't get your hopes up and have any illusions.
What election? What rules? It's settled. If you don't like it, go back to Twitter.
That's what you think. The only thing left to do is to start discussing and voting - for the candidates. I'll recuse myself. Take your time. It's a dictatorship here.
Where is this in the rules?
Anything that might offend or insult other visitors is forbidden. These posts will be deleted.
An admin is also a visitor.
Suggestion.
Posts, as well as quoted posts that are insulting or disrespectful to moderators, will be deleted immediately and without any warning.
D.Fyodor, is that a suggestion to whom? The two ................ forum members? And you hope to get their approval?
Or is that for everyone ? So everyone is on your side.
Mishek and if we all vote here - and a majority say that it is necessary to think again about who will be a moderator? Then what would happen... :)v
IMHO - this discussion shows very clearly where we are going. :( So consider that the modders haven't been sort of approved yet. It'll be easier that way.
The moderators are already there. And there is no need to approve them. And there is no need to turn everything into a bazaar.
If the administration decides they need other moderators, that's their right. I don't particularly crave it, and I don't.
If you read something like these rules . https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://forum.academ.org/index.php?showtopic=246739, you will find that the current rules of the forum have it all, just not written down.
There are rules on this forum. And they must be observed by all. :) And it's not in the rules. If there aren't, that's it, you have no right to make any claims against the moderators.
Bear, what if we all vote here - and a majority says we should think again about who will be a moderator? Then what would happen... :)v
IMHO - this discussion shows very clearly where we are going. :( So consider that the modders haven't been sort of approved yet. It'll be easier that way.
there is no majority on forums - everyone comes and goes as they see fit
Just like there's no such thing as an election day in ... there is only a suggestion that if you want, please apply, discussion in private.
There is an administration that acts in accordance with their interests, if not - make your own site/forum, you will be an administrator, moderator and user )))))))).
SZZ: Democracy is not demagoguery.
Yes. And hotheads would do well to apologise today and clean up the mess they've made