Does the Grail exist? - page 170
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In my opinion, volatility changes from year to year. And optimization has to be done over and over again. But have it your way: I bring the reports without changing the settings:
3-year report:
Four years report:
It's a pity if FantasYGold has really gone bust.
I'd love to see the miracle of the account going from $100 to $10,000... in front of the amazed gentlemen of the DCs and the rest of the public.
What, two plums at titan already?
Too bad (((( I wanted to believe ))))
sorry (((( wanted to believe ))))
По моему, из года в год меняется волатильность. И оптимизацию надо проводить снова и снова. Но будь по вашему: привожу отчеты без изменения настроек:
отчет за 3 года:
There you have it: 70% p.a. on a 70% drawdown. Excluding overheads. Are you sure you would like to trade on the real with such an Expert Advisor?
Although, at first glance, the results seem quite good, at least there is no complete loss in spite of the long period. Perhaps, the Expert Advisor may be promising if you have worked with it a little more.
As for the optimization, it certainly needs to be done, but the problem is when? The present has already become the past! Therefore, my opinion is that the basic principles of the Expert Advisor should work undeniably.
About Titan, didn't want to get in prematurely, although there was a desire to warn the man on a wave of intense euphoria after the showy demo win, but Matemat and others were right about pulling big drawdowns. The future almost never repeats itself, and it's good if it only changes slightly, then there's a chance to make money! Personally, I had a lot of doubts about this, and besides (sorry I didn't notice on the demo) trading with 1:500 leverage is complete madness!
Although I hope he didn't stop his work, but just took into account the lesson provided.
Вот вам и ответ: 70% годовых при просадке 70%. Без учета накладных расходов. Вы уверены, что хотели бы торговать на реале с таким советником?
Хотя на первый взгляд довольно неплохие результаты, по крайней мере нет полного слива, несмотря на длительный период. Возможно, поработав над ним еще, советник мог бы быть перспективным.
А по поводу оптимизации, ее конечно нужно проводить, но проблема - когда? Настоящее уже стало прошлым! Поэтому мое мнение такого, что неоспоримо должны работать базовые принципы, заложенные в советнике.