What is everyone looking for? - page 29
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Really fucking why? In a couple of weeks I'll show you that zz is not something to look up to.
Hmmm, that's what fractals should have been checked too by the way - I'll check it out.
You mean you'll beat SS1 ?
............. Logically, an indicator as a system for finding recurring patterns is a logical conclusion. Conditionally dynamic, and the market, absolutely dynamic. (As far as I know, not a single indicator can signal these types of movements.
FA - absence of economic news, problems not solved - a flat, some people do well and others do bad - a trend.
The answer is, - I wasn't even trying to outplay the casino! - it's the casino that probability works! (is that where your system comes from?)
То есть переплюнешь SS1 ?
You mean a TC based on ZZ?
I am not going to spit on anyone or anything. I am simply showing that ZZ is not a perfect indicator in terms of hypothetical profitability.
And please do not "poke". Even though I find you quite antipathetic, I don't allow it.
"What are you, an intellectual?" "No, I'm not! I'm just as much of a boor as you are."
Ну почему же, млять, именно ЗЗ, а не что-нибудь еще жутко граальное на истории - скажем, фракталы? На этот вопрос мне никто не ответил.
И почему ЗЗ - определенный и одинаковый, вне зависимости от исследуемой ТС (иТС)? Ну вот не пойму я, как можно сравнивать одну и ту же жопу с абсолютно разными пальцами разных зверюшек...
Response. I took the zigzag as an example of an "ideal". I'm not imposing ideals at all.
However, I do know a couple of local proofs that the zigzag with H just above the spread pumps the maximum out of the market. *
// ** In hindsight, of course.
//* One proof Neutron, the other getch, or rather his tester advisor.
This, however, does not mean that it is practical to choose the zigzag as the ideal. // imho.
// I will gladly watch the "battle of the ideals" (if it takes place). But from the podium. :)
As for fractals - they are hardly suitable for being ideals. They are essentially the same stumps of a zigzag, with the same redrawing and even more flaws.
You mean a TS based on ZZ?
I'm not going to spit on anyone or anything. I am simply showing that ZZ is not a perfect indicator in terms of hypothetical profitability.
And please do not "poke". Even though I find you quite antipathetic, I don't allow it.
"What are you, an intellectual?" "No, I'm not! I'm as much of a boor as you are."
ZZ has parameters that allow to make a well-defined step in price and time, => if in some particular period of time in the past (although this is a clarification from the "perfect filter" area) some ZZ parameters were more profitable than others, it only means that they were selected, that's all. It is not the selection of all possible profits that is of interest, but the comparison. And we should probably select some parameters of ZZ as "standard" ones. So that there is no confusion when comparing with future ind. Well, I chose parameters by eye there - they are quite standard and well founded, not for optimization reasons, but simply as a matter of practice. So it seems to me.
** As for poking - no problem - I can also poke. Will it make you feel better - I don't think so :)
And please don't "poke" me. Even though I find you very antipathetic, I don't allow it.
I keep forgetting to ask, what's the reason my pathetic persona is so antipathetic to you? :)
Все забываю спросить - что является причиной того что моя жалкая персона вам так весьма антипатична? :)
Arrogance and disrespect for the other person. You are obviously not a stupid person, but you need to work on your behaviour. Look around you - how many people you have turned against you.
Ну почему же, млять, именно ЗЗ, а не что-нибудь еще жутко граальное на истории - скажем, фракталы? На этот вопрос мне никто не ответил.
И почему ЗЗ - определенный и одинаковый, вне зависимости от исследуемой ТС (иТС)? Ну вот не пойму я, как можно сравнивать одну и ту же жопу с абсолютно разными пальцами разных зверюшек...
For any set of reversal trade signals, it is easy to construct a ZZ simply by finding highs and lows between the reversal points. It is obvious (to me, at least) that this very ZZ would be an ideal for a given set of signals. That is, every time we may be talking about... er ... finger of the same particular beast.
Arrogance and disrespect for the other person. You are obviously not a stupid person, but you need to work on your behaviour. Look around you - how many people you've turned against yourself.
None other than the - listed above. :) You, M, Sweene, and Neve, too.I have no arrogance as a class - I'm just very busy - and therefore no time for formulas. And besides I have to admit that I don't take well to people who troll, for instance the pathetic banter I made about Neveteran, or the equally pathetic one about Lavina. I'm even irritated by such behavior - well, a person thinks something for himself, thinks with his own ideas, has his own vision. You can point out his mistakes, you can correct him, you can give him advice. You can just give your opinion - such as "I think that this is just a scam" But certainly not "idiotic behavior of the crowd.
On the other hand - I try to treat people on their merits, if a man is a hard worker and a fighter - then there will be no arrogance from me personally. If he does not understand shit, does even less and learns but still puts out with the banter on the newcomers (And it's here and some) For me, such a poveney man - is an attempt to raise self-esteem at the expense of ntyubek. I guess I'm just saying that other people don't tell the truth - is that a bad thing? Yeah, probably bad. But what can you do - that's just the way it is, damn it.
...Но тут уж что поделаешь - какой уж есть, черт побери.
Well, brother, you're forcing the issue of flubbing in your thread. The unbiased reader will be surprised to find that the two parts of your post differ only in who the actions in question come from. 'They' have 'cheesy banter' and 'I try'. Like, their spies are spies and our spies are spies.
When you brush it off, bear in mind that I have no personal interest, as I took no one's side in your arguments.