What is everyone looking for? - page 34

 
MetaDriver >>:

А вапче правильная картинка описана здесь https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/124729/page2#288921

? What d'you mean?

 
Svinozavr >>:

? What d'u mean?

Nothing. I haven't thought of the meanings yet. You can come up with your own. Something esoteric. Or better yet, make it up as other people's questions come in, by context.

 

MetaDriver:

"Nobody" must be me. I had a break at work and found the same question for me somewhere in the middle of it. :)

Answer. I took the zigzag as an example of the "ideal". I'm not imposing ideals at all.

However, I know a couple of local proofs that the zigzag with H just above the spread pumps the maximum out of the market

. //

*

* * Backwards, of course.

// ** One proof is Neutron's, the other is getch's, or rather his tester advisor.

This, however, does not mean that it is practical to choose the zigzag as an ideal

.

// imho

// I will gladly watch the "battle of the ideals" (if it takes place)

.

But from the rostrum. :)

As for fractals - they are hardly suitable for ideals

.

They are essentially the same fragments of zigzag with the same redrawing and even more shortcomings

.

slightly exceeding, by how much? 2spread? how was this value obtained (I suspect it fluctuates) ?

is this the value that Prival wrote about?

Prival 02.04.2009 09:24

)) I'll cite a stronger authority for me.

The 'H-volatility FR' you never found H. It jumps. It's a random value if you do it the way you researched it. Although I may not have understood everything there (I have not seen all studies).

Pastukhov should have defended his dissertation, this in the first place. You were looking for a pattern = an opportunity to earn I have more faith in your research. But h is, it is equal to twice the value of the spread, at least for the pair GBPUSD, more precisely in terms of radiolocation it is the value of movement that can be detected. This value is related to the threshold signal/noise ratio (I got it around 1.6-1.8 of the spread).

I wonder how the organizers of the championship came to this value.

If you take into account that

and whether this is the same number about which spoke Privat also here?

https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/114902/page15

That's a load of bollocks, sir. You don't believe in 50-50. That's great. Are you familiar with such an indicator as the ZigZag. If not, here's a picture.

I draw your attention to the fact that the entry point is also the exit point. This is a flip perfect system.

Now I would like to hear from you - how the point (one and the same), can be more important than itself in 1,6668686012150484809839545495751 times?

S.Y. To be important we need to add a couple more figures, because the accuracy is too low))

Mathemat 07.04.2010 20:25.

Not so much, joo. Just because I cursed doesn't mean I was offended by S in any way. It was just a word of mouth.

And the question itself was actually to MD. And now Candid.

Obviously, the effectiveness of the two-machine system cannot be compared with the ZZ-ideal. I'm afraid no real system will provide that at all. I keep trying to push the idea that the ideal itself should be built with the specifics of the iTS ("the TS under investigation") in mind.

Or try to evaluate the system as I suggested earlier - through the quality of input and quality of output for each position and then the general quality of the whole system. But there is no need to construct an ideal: it is sort of self-evident and completely corresponds to the TS itself.

Then the easiest and at the same time the one that can take the most from the market when trading using this TS is an over-rotation TS in ZZ with the parameter

In this case, the signals of this particular TS may be taken as ideal in the study of equity of TS, not the price.

to compare different parameters of one TS in relation to the idle one, where is the ideal in this case for the system in the NC at the OD of which MD said


 
Trololo:

slightly exceeding, by how much? 2spread?
how was this value obtained
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9234
 


Thanks, but I guess I didn't mean....

I'm more about this one.

https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/105740/page45(https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/117162) https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/119989

sab1uk 19.07.2009 19:04

we can make three-story formulas but we can't identify the noise.

Well, I'll make people's life easier.

To prove that noise does exist you need to draw trend lines on the history (based on the strategy) ...

all price deviations from these lines are noise.

that's why prices are not just noisy but become very noisy

sab1uk 20.07.2009 14:48

once again - on the history (based on the strategy)

it means that noise should be measured in each case for a specific TS

by the trend lines I meant the zigzag formation by reversal signals of the reverse strategy

 
By the way S Programmer is the one who left the recent forum? If so, who knows where he went?
 
Nowhere. Sitting in the same town as before. He's very mysterious all over.
 

Yes the city is something to give, I thought maybe someone knows what resource he is on, questions to ask him.

 
Mathemat:
Nowhere. Sitting in the same town as before. He's very mysterious all over.

Mate, there's no way you can guess where I am physically right now. :)) Don't even try, :) And I'm not mysterious, :) I need detectives like you. :)

Trollolo, I don't have any answers, if you mean questions. :)

 
SProgrammer:

Mate, there's no way you can guess where I am physically right now. :)) Don't even try, :) And I'm not a mystery man, :) I need people like you. :)

Trollolo, I don't have any answers, if you mean questions. :)


Still, what was that long number? I wonder ))))