Once again, about the lokas. - page 56

New comment
 
Mischek:

No way. The cup of patience is overflowing. War. Are you for the boys or for the locker girls?
)) Can I be Switzerland? In the event of armed conflicts, as a neutral country, I will act as a mediator.
 
Mischek:

No way. The cup of patience is overflowing. The swine-saurus is sick of them for the third hour in a row, blue already. War. Are you a boy or a girl locker?
maybe something you ate?
 
OnGoing:
)) Can I be Switzerland? In the event of armed conflicts, as a neutral country, I will act as a mediator.


No way. We will shed blood while you make money in the land of cheeses and chocolates. Make up your mind.

" I'll give you a parabellum "

 
>
 
I'll give you a bazooka. And I'll be persuaded that it's a telescope. What a moon! Look at it!
 
went into Nirvana.
 
Lock always lock everywhere and no nails and don't give a toss to the turkeys and ats...
 
Although lokiing is forbidden but lokiing is present - my topic has gone there without a trace ))
 
khorosh:

There are ardent supporters of loci. There are their opponents. Their difference seems to be that the supporters supposedly know how to destroy the locks, and their opponents do not know how.
Perhaps it's true - who got used to that and uses it. In my opinion, the ability to destroy gaps is equivalent to the ability to trade profitably. If you cannot trade profitably, losing lots will not help. If there were a 100% successful, formalized, history-proven algorithm for closing gaps, it would be a grail. I believe there is no such algorithm. Can anyone claim that such an algorithm exists?

I've written a lot of EAs on this subject. Bottom line is simple:

minus a double spread

and hangs.

Although ...... It is possible to solve this problem, but what is the point? In the loss of possible profits or what? The lock is the maximum - the indicator. But there's enough without it.

 
Look in the book and you see ALL the figures and the same one ha ha ha!
1...49505152535455565758596061
New comment