You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, if it says "market order", then the order has already changed from a pending order to a market order. And market order cannot be deleted.
You have to delete it somehow before.
Well, if it says "market order", then the order has already changed from a pending order to a market order. And market order cannot be deleted.
You have to delete it somehow before.
This case is not terrible. Those fractions of a second that it doesn't have time to be removed are not scary. I have found cases where there is no reaction for 10-15 seconds at a time. I will wait for one if it still happens.
Bid<=(OrderOpenPrice()+4*Point)
I don't understand: why do you wait until the price is close to the order to delete the pending order?
Bid<=(OrderOpenPrice()+4*Point)
I don't understand: why do you wait until the price is close to the order to delete the pending order?
Well, you just have to. There is no other way to adapt the code to the tester's results. I switched from ticks to minutes.
Well, you just have to. There's no other way to adapt the code to the tester's results. I switched from ticks to minutes.
Maybe you could still tell the general idea - and there will be help not on coding, but on algorithmic errors (tactical). Well, the transition from ticks to minutes should not change the program structure
Comment writes in the top left corner of the graph window.
Right, I forgot. Thank you. It's there.
DSerg is a troll! Even the peak has a smirking face on it.
He's from lurkmore.ru ! Come on guys, let's find him and teach him a lesson!
DSerg is a troll! Even the peak has a smirking face on it.
He's from lurkmore.ru ! Come on guys, let's find him and teach him a lesson!
Where's the proof?
Or can you accuse anyone of anything like that?