[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 525
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hardly relativism here, Andrew. In any case, physicists try to explain with the help of this hypothesis sudden changes of geographicalbelts of the Earth, which were in its history.
Here, perhaps, it is a matter of instability of rotation of a body around the "mean axis of inertia". I am not a mechanic, but I think this is where to dig.
It's probably about the instability of the body's rotation around the 'mean axis of inertia'. I'm not a mechanic, but I think this is where to dig.
and most likely in the levers.
In these videos, the centre of mass does not correspond to the centre of rotation.
How's that?
a rotating object looking for the optimum distribution
a rotating object is looking for the optimum distribution
Then it is not the Janibekov effect :) . The centre is on the axis of rotation and does not make oscillatory movements. Or rather at the point of rotation for the unstable case.
we see only a small part of the process, if you spin the book in a vacuum to make it rotate longer, sooner or later it will reach the optimum distribution.
and here it's just the very beginning and is stated as a whole with unexpected properties