[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 454
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Live together...)))
Watching with interest how things develop...
I'm slowly writing a script that fully checks the set amount the way I think B would do before the last line. But the script will be on B :)
Even efficiency isn't important yet, that's for later. The main thing is to reproduce all the calculations accurately.
At least take your mind off the pundits. Here's an interesting article, the book is big and doesn't fill up unfortunately.
What do you think? Can a "stool with 2 legs" stand? How many forces have to act on the moon to keep it from falling to Earth and flying off into Space? We were told at school that two. Is it true?
Sergei and Alexei, at least take your mind off the pundits. Here's an interesting article, the book is big and doesn't fill up unfortunately.
What do you think? Can a "stool with 2 legs" stand? How many forces have to act on the Moon so that it doesn't fall to Earth and fly off into Space? We were told at school that two. Is it true?
It's filling right up. Just unpack it before you start.
It's a lot of boooooooooos. But curious, albeit pseudoscience.
And I'll take my mind off the pundits when I have an idea of how many solutions there are for a problem with a limit of, say, 100,000 or even a million.
My algorithm will not be quadratic in limiting the sum, but rather linear or not too far from it.
Honestly, I've seen all sorts of things... but I've never seen so much nonsense in one article.)
I'm going to vomit)))