I think we are talking about translating the client's wishes into a language that the programmer understands.
There used to be a profession called "task manager", maybe there is one somewhere now too.
Dmitry, you probably do not like illiterate terms of reference and spend a lot of time clarifying
If an intermediary takes up half of this time and you get a formalized structured ToR, then all will win
the algorithm with the customer I formalize the algorithm with the programmer we formalize together
(I interrupt until 1 p.m.)
Dmitry, you probably do not like illiterate terms of reference and spend a lot of time clarifying
If an intermediary takes up half of this time and you get a formalized structured ToR, then all will win
the algorithm with the customer I formalize the algorithm with the programmer we formalize together
(I interrupt until 1 p.m.)
The level of training of the stager must be an order of magnitude higher than of the developer (programmer)
I think we are talking about translating the client's wishes into a language that the programmer understands.
There used to be such a profession as "task manager", maybe it still exists somewhere.
It sort of exists, but not very much. The salary rate is 2.5 times higher than that of a programmer. It's good that this issue has been raised, I wanted to talk about it for a long time but didn't know where to start.
Utopia...
Like I, as a customer, first have to find a "problem setter", and then look for a programmer with this task?
What if the "task manager" made a mistake in this task? Who do I have to ask?
The more so that the customer will not even understand where the error is? In the code or in the task itself?
So I think there is no sense in it...
A programmer must set his own task and solve it
It depends on the kind of training involved. The stager does not have to be a programmer himself, but must have an excellent understanding of the steps to be programmed, what tools will and can be used and what results can be achieved.
Dmitry, you probably do not like illiterate terms of reference and spend a lot of time clarifying
If a mediator takes up half of this time and you get a formalized structured ToR, everyone will win
the algorithm with the customer I formalize the algorithm with the programmer we formalize together
(I interrupt until 1:00 p.m.)
I am all for it! All hands and feet, if there will be such a ToR, which is enough to read once, sit down and write. I'm not so much in the need for the right TOR (just what is called a TOR), but rather that the texts were written in such a way that it was clear what they say. Usually - "this", "that", "there", some kind of "stop" - either a stoploss or a stopgap, and you end up in a limbo. The main activity is working on a language metamodel, from NLP. The idea is good, but I do not know whether it will reduce the cost to customers, or vice versa. I had to write the terms of reference to get the pay less - I had to write a week, and the work was done in one day.
Как бы типа существует, но не очень сильно. Ставка по зарплате в 2,5 раза выше, чем у программиста. Хорошо, что подняли этот вопрос, давно об этом хотел поговорить, но не знал с чего начать.
This is an interesting question, but as I've already written, a stager is needed for big projects. How many big MQL projects have you personally done? I've done no more than 2 with a total of over a hundred, although there are many more in other areas.
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use