To follow up - page 39

 
avatara >>:

...

Because it is only there that the senior zigzag has switched.

Here we are playing against the high zigzag, so on its upward move shorts will be opened. On a downward move it will open longs.

 

33 is not a signal.

Again, 33 (and of what dimensionality?) is only a fragment of QC.

I was, however, looking into the future for the transfer of the ideal response function at the principal coordinates to the FP.

But exploring the parameters near the non-significance region of the response is also important - later.

If the profile is random over the whole surface of QC - what QC can we be talking about?

You seem to have shown in your 3D that the profile is not random.

So let's look for coordinates. Measurable in real time.

;)

 
This is where our paths diverge, me to the RWB, the rest to the TRS :)
 
Candid >>:
Тут наши пути расходятся, мне к РВВ, остальным к ИВВ :)

Don't be sarcastic.

The TRS is not a TRS.

There are no entrances. That's one. There is a mapping in the phase space of the state of the object with a known ideal result ("output" according to you).

But that too, I repeat, to identify areas where the phase description allows us to see a stable manifestation of a non-random and meaningful (yes! an ideal so far) profit.

is the first step.

I note - all other coordinates are "measured" in real-time - without looking.

---

Obviously a continuation.

Checking these QC's on a test period.

Your way, on the other hand, reminds me of "optimizing" on a "tester" a K-machine system with M-parameters.

Apart from the dubious pleasure of pseudo results, nothing.

Maybe there will be nothing from this undertaking either.

But we don't use a priori models.

Unlike your TRS, where only the CD is left of the Real, and everything - from parameters to TC is introduced from outside.

;)

 
avatara >>:

Есть нанечение в фазовом пространстве состояние обьекта с известным идеальным результатом ( по Вашему- "выходом").

Но и это, повторюсь, для определения областей где фазовое описание позволяет увидеть устойчивое проявление неслучайного и значимого профита.

это первый шажок.

In all seriousness I stated my opinion almost immediately, it is about the same as a non-zero MO of the continuation of the stroke of the gear at the moment of shifting, nothing can be made of this wonderful information. However, I could be wrong, let you go this way at least to pictures similar to mine, and then you will see.

 
Candid >>:

Всерьёз ... вы пройдёте этот путь хотя бы до картинок, аналогичных моим, а там видно будет.

I told you about the approaches.

Now just enlarge the picture.



You can see that Direct and DirectH are the junior and senior 33 directions.

;)

 
avatara >>:

Я говорю о подходах.

А теперь просто увеличьте картинку

The first association is with a sliced three-dimensional picture. Can you explain what kind of salad this is supposed to make?

The three-dimensional picture is much clearer, isn't it more time-consuming to make?

Some time ago, I also thought that everything should be clear to everyone from the first glance on the picture or on the source. Therefore, I am ready to wait until you understand the need to explain, at least briefly (but comprehensible), what is intended and how it is achieved.

I'll also remind you, that besides diagrams I have more screenshots with traces of trade simulator's work :)

 
Candid >>:

Первая ассоциация - это нарезанная ломтиками трёхмерная картинка. Может Вы объясните, какой салат из этого предполагается сделать?

Всё-таки трёхмерная картинка значительно нагляднее, неужели её приготовление более трудоёмко?

Когда-то я тоже полагал что всем всё должно быть ясно с первого взгляда на картинку или на исходник. Поэтому я готов ждать, пока Вы поймёте необходимость хотя бы кратко (но доступно) объяснять что задумано и как это достигнуто.

Позволю себе также напомнить, что кроме диаграмм у меня есть ещё скрины со следами работы симулятора торговли :)

It's a breakdown and very rough on the CC.

With the wrong coordinates, so far.

And 80K observations don't look good on a graph.

And it's an illustration of a possible search methodology, not its results.

---

Screens?

Appreciate the humour!

 
avatara >>:

Это разбивка и очень грубая на КК.

С неправильными координатами, пока.

А 80К наблюдений плохо смотрятся на графике.

И это иллюстрация возможной методологии поиска, а не его результатов.

Hmmm, I wonder if I should repeat myself :) . I recently tried to explain long and tediously in this thread that I have absolutely no idea what to do with the results obtained by such methodology.

80K numbers for a 3D picture is not much. It all depends on how you process and present it.


By the way, some time ago, unimaginably long ago, I told you how I created additional characteristics for orders. You could make a simple simulator in an indicator on these same features.

 
Candid >>:

Хм, вот думаю, повторяться или не нужно :) .

I think it is not necessary.

I recently tried to explain in this thread long and tediously that I have absolutely no idea what to do with the results obtained by such methodology.

especially...

By the way, once upon a time, unimaginably long ago, I told you how I make additional characteristics for orders. You could make a simple simulator in an indicator on the same features.

All the way from the CC.

and that's a pity...