"The 'perfect' trading system - page 31
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Total Net Profit 11890 Gross Profit 11900 Gross Loss -10 Profit Factor 1190
Total numbers of trades 23 Number winning trades 22 Number losing trades 1 Percent profitable 95.65%
Largest winning trade 5550 Largest losing trade -10
Average winning trade 540.9091 Average losing trade -10 Avg trade 516.9565
I can make you such a statement on the history in 5 minutes.
I understand that Gross Loss -10 is purposely introduced to avoid the division into zero when calculating the profit factor?
Er, is this a test? Then why didn't it "work out" with the pam?
Because it's a test of an over-optimised EA. It's a real-world loser. As evidenced by the pam.
Uh, is this a test? Then why didn't it work out with pamm?
with pamm, it doesn't seem to have worked out, but curled up... into a tube.
Eh, is this a test? Why it did not work out with PAMM?
We have enough adaptive trading robots "in stock" for 1000 PAMMs :)
I wrote earlier - we solved the problem of achieving stability and it seems to have been solved - at least so far everything looks good.
Next, let's think about increasing profits.
I can make you such a statement on the history in 5 minutes.
I understand that Gross Loss -10 is purposely introduced to avoid the division by zero when calculating the profit factor?
You have to "concoct" it manually, but ours automatically "concocts" it :)Because this is a test of an over-optimised EA. It's the kind of thing that gets lost in the real world. As evidenced by the pam.
They don't leak anything - they just don't have enough trades.We have enough adaptive trading robots "in stock" for 1000 PAMMs :)
I wrote earlier - we solved the problem of achieving stability and sort of solved it - at least so far everything looks good.
Next, let's think about increasing profits.
So, you have learned how to make consistently losing Expert Advisors and now you are throwing your efforts to make them profitable? Congratulations.
They're not losing anything - just not enough trades.
"And you friends, no matter how you sit down, you're never good enough to be a musician". You can call it what you like, but equity is going down. And even today's rollover showed a loss.
They're not losing anything - just not enough trades.do you hope to achieve profitability by increasing the number of losing trades?
We have enough adaptive trading robots "in stock" for 1000 PAMMs :)
I wrote earlier - we solved the problem of achieving stability and it seems to have been solved - at least so far everything looks good.
Next, we will think about increasing the profits.
I guess you have your own idea of "achieving stability" and "everything looks good so far". It's hard to explain to an investor, or rather almost impossible.
I'll leave you to it. Let's watch your progress in the pamm arena.