SPAM, SPAMMERS and their ASSOCIATES... - page 152

 
sergeyas:

The last four posts from Freud in this thread have been nothing but bickering, settling of personal scores, etc.

It's all spilling over into different threads....

It's disgusting to read(((((((

So are we. ((

But here, as you can see, there are only a few people who throw poo at each other.

We can't stop them from doing it. After all, poop is warm and it feels so good to crumple it in their hands and savor it on their tongues.

Unfortunately there is not a majority on this forum who are genuinely touched by it. All forum users do not give a damn, maybe they even like sniffing and watching it. That's why moderators can't ban these people from continuing to do so, as it will continue again.

But if a constitutional majority were to gather against such behaviour, then of course the question could be raised about the compliance of posts with forum rules.

 
sergeev:

So do we. ((

But here, as you can see, there are only a few people who throw poo at each other.

We cannot forbid them to do so. After all, poo is warm and it feels so good to crumple it in their hands and savor it on their tongues.

Unfortunately there isn't a majority on the forum who are really touched by this. All the forum members don't care, maybe they even enjoy sniffing and watching it. So the moderators can't ban these people from doing it further, as it will continue again.

But if a constitutional majority is assembled against such behaviour, then of course the question can be raised about the compliance of posts with forum rules.


Authority I would add.

Whatever - that's unlikely.They have even less power.

A constitutional majority is needed in the Duma to deal with matters of a different order.

On a private resource, the owner's will is sufficient.

 

The main thing is that you can't deny that the same mishluk's past nickname has a number of thousands of posts, and what is their content, and what is the subject matter of the forum?

you would not deny that the same mishluks have that in the past nickname the number of posts counts in thousands, in this one - how many. and what is their content, and what is their topic on the forum. nevertheless, the effectiveness of moderation allowed him to do it, and some do not.... so it's better this way.

 
sergeyas:

Authority I would add.

What kind of authority?

Whatever - that's unlikely.

No, they 100% don't care. You seem to be the only one of the 100 forum members available who is affected by this.

On a private resource, the owner's will is sufficient.
Moderators are not proprietors, they are supposed to maintain public order, encouraged by the majority. Here, order is not encouraged by these 100 people. Therefore, there is nothing to observe.
 
It's what you wanted. Truth-tellers.
 
Freud:

The main thing is that you can't deny that the same mishluk's past nickname has a number of thousands of posts, and what is their content, and what is the subject matter of the forum?

after much discussion, there has been a reassessment of actions.

You are no longer a schoolboy to be forbidden to stick your head in your favourite toilet. Moreover, as I have already said, there has been an analysis of visits. From which it became clear that the forum will not get worse if there is more poo in it.

you would not deny that the same mishluks have that in the past nickname the number of posts counts in thousands, in this one - how many. and what is their content, and what is their topic on the forum. nevertheless, the effectiveness of moderation allowed him to do it, and some do not.... so it's better this way.


I won't. So you now have a unique opportunity to crap not only in certain threads, but in general the entire resource. 100s of visitors to this resource have long been accustomed to all this stench.

 
Yeah, you got it, you signed it, you're happy.... Don't make it sound like it was done upon request... How much blood has been shed on the forum in battles over it - just to be objective and equal before the rules. so there would not be such rudeness, about which I wrote above
 
Freud, moskitman:
Yosya and Andrei, what you are doing is destroying freedom of speech. They will have something to charge you with, but do you need it? There are private chat rooms, both have Skype accounts and you can argue, even live on air.
 
sergeev:

After lengthy discussions, there has been a reassessment of actions.

You are not a schoolboy to forbid you to stick your head in your favorite toilet. Moreover, as I said before, the analysis of visits was carried out. From which it became clear that the forum will not get worse if there is more poo in it.


I won't. So you now have a unique opportunity to crap not only in certain threads, but in general the entire resource. 100s of visitors to this resource have long been accustomed to all this stench.


The forum is dying out little by little with about 20 old users and 10 new friends and coworkers.

The forum is dying out little by little, 20 old friends and 10 newbies, that's it, newbies come in five at once....

And do not cover it up that for the majority of users it is not interesting. Probably the administration of the forum does not need it.

 
Freud:

The forum is dying out little by little with about 20 old users and 10 new friends and coworkers.

The forum is dying out little by little, 20 old friends and 10 newbies, that's it, newbies come in at once....

And do not cover it up that for the majority of users it is not interesting. Probably the administration of the forum does not need it.


you yourself have answered your own questions.

so you have the green light.

Be happy and keep on shitting in the cammats.