You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You may open on the daily and then pull up a stop on the lower fractals of a smaller TF
Played)
added trailing on fractals.
a little more and a grail :D
Only Fractals_TF should probably be named
Only Fractals_TF should probably be named
I think it is correct to rely on the following things:
- the nature of the movement within the breakout range, and the sentiment before the breakout(which is less important)
- The general trend, possibly on a larger TF.
As for the last one, try to dance from Parabolic, maybe it will help.
Wrote... The result turned out to be worse than originally.... Prof. factor is only 1.31 after optimisation :(
I think it is more sensible to use oscillators in this system
Anyway, I'm not trying to write a super system here... I described the reason for doing this at the beginning of the thread.
I wanted to check something out, namely. My main goal is (I didn't want to say so at first, but I think this branch is going to be extinguished) to find out how the system that I am improving over a period of history (say, last half year) will behave over previous periods. I told at the beginning it's a 50/50 system in a long term, i.e. if we draw the system in 2009 at maximum profitability, will it work better in the past ... Suppose we take it to the level of pr.f.. 2.0 or higher... will it perform better since e.g. 2000 ? ???
I assume (and only assume!!!) that the better it performs today, the worse it will perform in the long run. I.e. we gain maximal profit today, and the system will not show 1,0 on history, and probably will fall to 0,9
But this is just a guess... I'm not trying to prove anything yet.... And honestly, I hope I'm wrong.
I honestly don't understand why trying to figure out how the system will behave in the past. It is better to look to the future. The market is changing and there is no getting away from it. Even if
Я предпологаю (и только предпологаю!!!), что чем лучше она будет работать сегодня, тем хуже она отработает в долгосрочке.
even if it does, so what?
My personal supposition (and only supposition))) is that there is no dependence, and having said (even having proved) this for one system, or even for a thousand systems, it is not a fact that it will be the same for absolutely all systems.
There is a good saying - do not look for happiness where it is not present.
My personal belief (and only belief))) is that there is no dependency.
That's what I want to make sure of...
Take an Expert Advisor that works 50/50 on history and add some extra indicators, oscillators and other tricks to it. Test it on a small period of time (half a year) and see what happens...
Many thanks to Swan and gince for showing interest. And you'dbetter sayfuji suggest something .... like how to close a position on something other than the t.p., maybe it would help...
Just open at breakdown of the previous day's High/Low with a fixed TP and stop at this day's High/Low. Why exactly? Because it doesn't use any indicator.
My idea is 100% the same)) only on H4 Results tester...
The only thing is... My direction is chosen by the previous candle, and the stop is set at the lower of the two - the current/previous High/Low...
My idea is 100% the same)) only on H4 Results tester...
The only thing is... my direction is chosen by the previous candle, and the stop is placed by the smaller of the two - the current/previous high/low...
Great idea... it's worth trying to dance from it...
I looked at the link, the period is small... have you tried with 2000? maybe the same problem will occur.... 50/50???