A list of programmers who are great at writing pay-for-performance codes and don't screw around - page 34
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Then keep it simple, refuse to be a pro-ger, put the results of trading on a real account on the Internet, and no hard feelings! :-о)
I'm not trading on the real account yet. I just write progies and test them. >> Searching, in general.
I, unfortunately, cannot share my ideas with anyone. It's very expensive and hard to get.
I can, but they're not easy to come by. And what's interesting is that, strange as it may seem, not all of them are "waste ore".
The person ordering an EA is either stupid or lazy, or most likely both.
Many of them are incapable of comprehending programming, though you cannot call them fools. It's just a way of thinking. Teach him higher mathematics for a hundred years, it does not matter: formulas at most he will learn but still will not understand. And at the same time he will be an excellent specialist in something humanitarian.
I have a friend from Dnipropetrovsk. He writes and speaks very illiterate and in general is bad with languages, but his head is simply brilliant. But to be fair, he really is lazy.
four2one wrote >> Absolutely all MQL programmers are waiting to be given an idea.
>> Too self-righteous. There is such a joke law of three sigmas. So waiting for that idea is not a wait...
And I can, although they don't come easily either. And here's the interesting thing: oddly enough, not all of them are "waste ore".
Many are fundamentally unable to get into programming - although you can not call them fools. It's just a way of thinking. Teach him higher mathematics for a hundred years, it does not matter: formulas at most he will learn but still will not understand. And at the same time he will be an excellent specialist in something humanitarian.
I have a friend from Dnipropetrovsk. He writes and speaks very illiterate and in general is bad with languages, but his head is simply brilliant. But to be fair I would say that he is really lazy.
Too confident. There is such a joke law of three sigmas. So wait for this idea - you can't wait...
Pushkin did not understand mathematics at all, so it was not in his element,
They called him to the blackboard, there was a tough equation on the blackboard, the teacher asked Pushkin:
tell sir what this equation is too early for.
Pushkin thought for a moment and then answered: ZERO!
--
For him, it really was zero.
but in poetry... he wasn't a zero.
--
Lyosha, I agree with you.
Life is interesting, diverse and it is wrong to divide people into fools and clever ones just because they are not expert in the subject which you are expert in.
> A person who ordered an adviser is either stupid or lazy, or most likely both.
I think Pushkin responded to such attacks so caustic that it would be difficult to wash off.
Pushkin didn't understand mathematics at all, so it wasn't his thing,
They call him to the blackboard, there's an equation on the blackboard, the teacher asks Pushkin:
tell me, sir, how early in the equation
Pushkin thought for a moment and then answered: ZERO!
--
For him, it really was zero.
but in poetry... he wasn't a zero.
--
Lyosha, I agree with you.
Life is interesting, varied and it is wrong to divide people into fools and clever ones just because they are not expert in the subject which you are expert in.
> A person who ordered an adviser is either stupid or lazy, or most likely both.
I think Pushkin responded to such attacks so caustically that it would be hard to wash off
Pushkin did not do mathematics, much less forex, he wrote poetry. Why does everyone across the street think he can trade in the stock market? FOOLISHNESS.
The best trader I have ever dealt with, by training and professional experience, is a fashion designer.
Pushkin did not do maths or moreover Forex, he wrote poetry. Why does every trader think that he can trade on the stock market? STUPIDITY.
Well, of course it's stupid.
You see how you reasoned in the stock market to trade means not everyone, and to write programs means anyone ...
According to your own thought, it's just as stupid to say :
>> I quote "The man ordering to write an EA is elementary either stupid or lazy, or most likely both.
---
whether programming is a craft or an art form, it's not for everyone.
like writing poetry.
---
Let someone who's not a programmer,
help HIDDEN https://forum.mql4.com/ru/17146/page7 find the checkbox identifier, or rather teach how to do it
with knowledge of Api at the level of a pro, of course.
and will do it faster and better than a pro.
And I can, although they don't come easily either. And here's the interesting thing: oddly enough, not all of them are "waste ore".
+(a lot) to Alexei.
----------------
A lot of people just think his idea is super. And you can't share this idea....
In fact, many ideas are not really worth sharing. That's a first.
But the most important thing is that when a person sincerely shares with others, he gets many times more in return.
He receives so much that perhaps his life would not be enough to generate everything he receives.
There comes a moment when truly talented ideas cannot be read or understood. There is not enough time. Not enough time to read carefully (and even skim over them)...
A lot of ideas can go in the open, directly on the forum. But very many also in correspondence, or give "seed" on the forum, and then go into the correspondence.
----------------
Sometimes you find yourself in a kind of blackout - it is impossible to know what to do first. There are some really talented ideas.
----------------
There's a lot to be said on this subject. It's worth trying to give back. And believe me, you will get many times more.
You can only see part of it on ONICS... in confirmation of what has been said...
And I can, although they don't come easily either. And here's the interesting thing: strangely enough, not all of them are "waste ore".
Many are fundamentally incapable of getting into programming - although you can not call them fools. It's just a way of thinking. Teach him higher mathematics for a hundred years, it does not matter: formulas at most he will learn but still will not understand. And at the same time he will be an excellent specialist in something humanitarian.
I have a friend from Dnipropetrovsk. He writes and speaks very illiterate and in general is bad with languages, but his head is simply brilliant. But to be fair I would say that he is really lazy.
Too confident. There is such a joke law of three sigmas. So waiting for that idea, you can't wait...
In many ways I agree, but a small BUT - those who are great at higher mathematics can be absolute ZEROs at programming!
Did you understand what you wrote?
From your response to a quite correct remark
laanaa0708 29.04.2009 00:40
Paha wrote(a) >>
If a man is a professional in other fields, has his own business, but no time to study the language and no possibility to delve into that maze, is it possible to call him lazy and dumb??? Nonsense.
Why the hell would you go into Forex? Every business requires maximum dedication. Is forex an exception?
From your point of view Forex is just auto-trading, and exclusively on mql.
If you read your answers, we can assume that you have written your own OS, browser, etc. for that kind of spam. :) And you do your business (if you have one, of course!) with the help of 'machine codes' :)
'
You'd better spell it right.
- You think that 2-wheel strategies or supposedly non-syndicator strategies are still working.
- For their coding, and on real accounts (not speaking about brokers, exchanges, interbank or just a really large depot), 6.5 lines of code is enough.
- These lines can be coded by "a physicist and a lyricist".
Then this thread will automatically become just a list of programmers' mail, that's what it was created for, and discussion of other questions will be carried out without flooding and in appropriate threads.
'
SZY. Personally, I'm already shy in sql'e queries and other normalizations :) and I could really use a programmer (not a coder).
But, as I understand it, "freelancer for research" isn't suitable, which doesn't automatically mean he's evil.
The main reason is the "appetite comes with food" already mentioned here. But if I, for example, was brought up with "no one will do it better than you" (and this statement is also controversial - MSSQL is a bit more complicated than dbf :) ), then what about modern highly specialized youth :)
'
SZY. On a spider, and here, thought that such simplicity mql (very exaggerated) leads to what Trading Strategies are substituted by advisers. (I don't remember verbatim, but the idea is close).
And in general the positions of all participants have already been defined by the middle of the branch, no one will change their opinion ... why continue?
The best trader I have ever dealt with, by training and professional experience, is a fashion designer.
And I am inspired by the experience of a friend who is a very thoughtful and successful stock trader. He's the former director of a rural brick factory.
nen wrote >>.
..There's a lot to be said on this subject. It's worth trying to give back. And believe me, you will get many times more.
+10. I hope I live to see this become a forum ideology.