Quantum trading system - page 14

New comment
 
Read the whole thread, watched all the videos, signed up on 2 sites with links... I wanted to connect a noise diode to the audio input of the sound board, and use the signal from it to trade... Am I going crazy...
 
У нас на физическом факультете Казанского государственного университета устойчиво существовало мнение, что квантовую механику во всем университете понимает только один человек - тот, кто ее преподает.
 
This does not only apply to quantum mechanics. Most participants in any discussion have little understanding of the main topic of discussion. Often there is simply a desire to make a mark on the topic under discussion. In order to create an opinion of one's own importance, labels are attached to those discussants whose opinions one does not want to agree with...
 
It all comes down to kitchen conversations. Like in Soviet times, everything was discussed in the kitchens. But nothing went beyond the kitchen. A storm in a glass of water.
 
HideYourRichess >> :

Bullshit, it's not about who makes money in the market. It's about basic illiteracy and really amazing talk about subjects they are not very good at. This, by the way, also concerns you.

I don't really give a shit...

Whether the ideas used in my MTS are literate or not...

The main thing is the result on the market... :)


What do you mean literate?

There was a time when it was considered, literate, that the earth was flat... :)

 
creation писал(а) >>

I don't really give a shit...

Whether the ideas used in my MTS are literate or not...

The main thing is the result on the market... :)

Strange to hear such a thing from a person concerned... Obviously, you cannot expect a positive result from an illiterate strategy, and on the contrary, investing effort and money in a development which is based on a scientific approach and is being handled by competent professionals is the best.

And what do you mean by competent?

There was a time when it was considered literate that the earth was flat... :)

That's not a correct remark. You cannot compare events of different eras. You have to compare within one era. From this position, it is more advantageous to listen to the most recent accumulated knowledge, even if some of it does not correspond to reality, in general, it will give more return.

 
Neutron >> :

It is strange to hear such a thing from an interested party... Obviously, you cannot expect positive results from an illiterate strategy, and on the contrary, investing energy and resources in a development which is based on a scientific approach and is handled by competent specialists is the best.

And how do you know what ideas and strategy I use, and what is the result of my MTS?

You without knowing this information cannot assess it, whether it is competent or not from your point of view...

Or are you clairvoyant? :)


I am not a person of interest.

I just want to make it clear that to each his own...

 
creation писал(а) >>

How do you know what ideas and strategy I use and what results my MTS brings?

Without knowing this information you cannot assess whether it is competent or not from your point of view...

Well, why not?

Precisely it is possible to assess with a certain degree of confidence, and for this you do not need to know what specific ideas and what specific strategy you are using. With the right level of accumulated knowledge and compilation, the general view of the subject is enough to reconstruct its details.

I'm not talking about you specifically, so no hard feelings. OK?

 
Neutron >> :

Well, why can't you?

It is possible to assess with a certain degree of certainty, and it is not necessary to know which ideas and which strategy you are using. With the right level of accumulated knowledge and compilation, a general view of the subject is enough to reconstruct its details.

I'm not talking about you specifically, so no hard feelings. OK?

The point is that a person who is not competent in a particular field quite often comes up with original ideas...


Precisely because lack of knowledge gives him more imagination...

And concreteness greatly narrows thinking... I don't mean it narrows it down, it makes it narrow-minded...


Therefore, if you think that a person speaks illiterate, indulge him, maybe he will make an important discovery ... :)

You don't know that person's potential...


And it is always possible to fill the gaps in a particular field... :)


After all, this is not an adolescent communication on the principle of I am cool and you are a sucker...

 
creation писал(а) >>

The fact is that a person who is not competent in a particular field quite often comes up with original ideas...

Precisely because his lack of knowledge gives him more imagination...

And specificity narrows thinking... I don't mean it narrows it down, it makes it narrow-minded...

Therefore, if you believe that a person speaks illiterate, treat him leniently, perhaps he will make an important discovery ... :)

You do not know the potential of this person...

And you can always fill the gaps in a particular field... :)

After all, this is not a teenage communication on the principle I'm cool and you're a sucker...

That's right. Whoever follows an untrodden path will find a solution quicker.

1...789101112131415161718192021...40
New comment