YZ_PIPSATOR_EURGPB - inspiration from championship results - page 27
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
But I would like to know what the animosity was based on?
Why? And if the number of such posts and such posters reaches several dozens per day, will you analyse them all? Do you have a lot of extra time? Do you need these dueling toothpicks?
this is good..., control and correct :-), the second box gives you the right to do so ...
I really wish you would strain the second cell and still answer! :-)
---
if we're talking normally and not stupid.
---you try to explain in what way i am wrong
For example, I have 13% on my payslip.
--
We are not talking about individual cases, we are talking about the masses.so there's no point in looking at that kind of thing.
---
Well, there are tax deductions - for example, when you buy real estate, 13% is deducted from the amount of income
not exceeding a million... I don't remember exactly, but 13% was not deductible.
It used to be, but after that it was 13% again :-).
And this is a one-off deal when you buy a second or third home.
---
That's why I said 13% anyway.
--
I don't know the tax code at tax officer level...
but I do know that 13% of the income of a full-time resident appears on almost everyone's...
If you can prove it's not true, that would be very interesting.
1. There is a concept of taxable base.
2. It can be reduced in various ways.
1. There is a concept of a taxable base.
2. It can be reduced in various ways.
that's all clear.
I was saying that these cases are the exception rather than the rule (as far as most are concerned)
and I'm well aware that there are options that pay less than 13%.
Or they do not pay 13% at all (like buying a house) but this option is temporary - until the limit is exhausted
---
In general, the basic income of the FL = 13%.
You are confused by the phrase "ANYWHERE"...
let me replace it with "PRACTICALLY ALWAYS".
It's all understandable.
I said that these cases are rather the exception than the rule (if we talk about the majority)
and I'm well aware that there are options that pay less than 13%.
Or do not pay 13% at all (like buying a home) but this option is temporary - until the limit is exhausted
---
but in general, the basic income of the FL = 13%.
You are confused by the phrase "ANYWHERE"...
Let me replace it with "PRACTICALLY ALWAYS".
So again:
----------------------------------------------
with the state at any rate in Russia 13%
---
and it's possible to hide, but usually not for long.
especially with large sums of money, like the famous Larry Williams story - who did pay his taxes!
-
everything is transparent - there are bank transfers - there are accounts - everything is monitored, the government sees all your movements
if you want, down to $1,
So who really trades knows that transactions as much as 600 thousand rubles
are subject to mandatory monitoring
Those who do not know this probably do not trade
or they trade by sums the government is not interested in for the time being
like petty cash
---
Up to $600K ~$20,000 because $20K is not much for a serious trader ---
---
so hiding = criminal case
---
If they were talking about barriers it probably wasn't these --- and if they were, then the trade is petty
-----------------------------------------------------
It's all officiousness nothing more, no details or other LEGAL schemes.
Partial answer was given here:
Had some real experience with the bank and tax office on this, and was on informal terms with them, so got a commentary on what was going on.
I can report a few observed features of monitoring the financial activities of individuals and businesses.
- No one wants us in the hell, no interested targeted work to find earners (up to a certain level of Abramovich's class).
- But! Accounts are monitored constantly, banks submit information on a daily basis, not only in terms of the amounts transferred, but also in terms of indirect indicators (frequency of
of transfers, repetitive wording, suspicious recipients, signs of money laundering, simple doubts about the integrity of the work). Banks get poked in the nose during inspections
for under-reporting, so the bankers apologise, warn customers, but knock on the top on a very wide spectrum.
- Tax authorities do not obtain information from banks directly, but only through an instruction from above. The tax authorities may request and receive this information from the bank if they carry out their own checks.
The reason for checking a natural person who is not an entrepreneur may be a signal or instruction from a higher authority, there is no direct monitoring.
So, sleep easy and pay your taxes (ideally automatically via a banking DC). Until it comes to green millions, we may only be interested in
The local "sanitarians of the forest".
P.S.
Some posts deleted, others not deleted.
pipsatora is a good thing in the tester or on a demo account where trades are completed instantly but in real life is one loss pathetic
it is absolutely correct!
The tester generates ticks!
on an M5 M15 in the tester it takes out all the take profit, and even on an m1
and in real life dealing filters do not produce this effect...
That's why it's incorrect to test the pipsator in the tester
there is a difference between demo and micro real
micro real differs from real
---
if we try to use pipsator input to raise targets!
but having looked at a chart of the leading pipsators, we may find that the entry points are good enough, but the targets are too small
--
in general, this is a system with a negative mathematical expectation of course
the more positive trades to negative ones, the better, for example 1:30 for a month or two
and will depend on the value of the stop
---
A partial answer has been given here:
I absolutely agree with that answer! that's the way it is,
but to the point where the big sums start moving
I absolutely agree with that answer! that's the way it is,
but to the point where the big sums start moving
There is no such point if there are friends
There's no point if you have friends...
woman
wife
children
grandchildren
--
You will have money.
you will have a woman
♪ when you get a woman ♪
¶ you'll have money disappearing ¶
♪ when your money disappears ♪
you will have a woman disappear.
¶ when you have a woman disappear ¶
♪ you'll have money again ♪
---
and if you take the woman out of the cycle, you'll be filthy rich.
(but hell, you can't do it without a woman)