Hidden divergence - page 34
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Speaking of the system from s2101, here are direct links to relatively recent "fans" (from M1 to M15)
What kind of system is this, just pictures instead of arguments. I classify the situation as follows: Guru looking for adepts (clients).
What kind of system is this, just pictures instead of arguments. I classify the situation as follows: the Guru is looking for adepts (clients).
No question.
I tried to sell this indicator to Geronimo, but it doesn't seem to fit him :). I can sell it to someone else :).
And what about undying love to free stuff? You can't kill it :-)
P.S. And how much does it cost?
P.S. How much is it?
I asked for $50, but I guess since the deal didn't go through anyway, I should have asked for more. :)
I asked for $50, but I think since the deal didn't go through anyway, I should have asked for more. :)
Just a gift.
Why did Geronimo say no?
Just a gift.
Why did Geronimo refuse?
I did not write that he refused. I only suggested that the indicator did not suit him. I think the reasons for his decision should be clarified with him.
P.S. By the way, whose love of freebies exactly was meant?
I did not write that he refused. I only suggested that the indicator did not suit him. I think the reasons for his decision should be clarified with him.
P.S. By the way, whose love of freebies did you mean exactly?I meant mine :-)
I thought that after Geronimo refused you will make an offer: Here is a free divergence indicator, take it and don't forget to make suggestions. I will make it in the best way :-) :-) :-)
s2101 has recommended parameters 9,21,5 in the OsMA oscillator. Look at the picture. The oscillator with these parameters is different from oscillators with normal parameters,
It gives a false signal. I know in advance what he will say, that we should look for other timeframes, other indicators and wave analysis. However, I have concluded for myself that it is better to use the original OsMA parameters. Let the oscillator give a signal later than a false signal that misleads. And then, these parameters have been tested by many years of historical experience.
I'm guessing they can tell
that there is no divergence or convergence
Well, I'm not discouraging it. Simply, if I have an opportunity of exact formula analysis, I use it and try to find out "why", i.e. logical bases. If I do not have such an exact opportunity, I try to perform statistical tests on as much material as possible. If the statistical tests steadily tell us that we have got the cat by the tail (caught the statistical advantage), then I am also happy with this explanation, i.e. just the "how".