Grail. The puzzle is an interesting theme. - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
These things are absolutely related to entries. The same as for exits, we need to "catch" entries at the beginning of a new trend (or mini-trend or micro-trend - depending on what scale we want to operate). A start of a new trend is always a reverse of the old trend (mini, micro, ...). Thus, we can put a general question: how to catch the beginning (or close to it) of a trend (mini or micro)? This one will answer both to "where to enter" and "where to exit". But here's the solution to this general question.... Then, in general, you don't need any advisors either - just, stand up all the depo and.... :))))
And these things are absolutely related to entries. Exactly the same as for exits, we need to "catch" entries at the beginning of a new trend (or mini-trend, or micro-trend - depending on what scales we want to operate with). A start of a new trend is always a reverse of the old trend (mini, micro, ...). Thus, we can put a general question: how to catch the beginning (or close to it) of a trend (mini or micro)? This one will answer both to "where to enter" and "where to exit". But here's the solution to this general question.... Then, in general, you don't need any advisors either - just, stand up all the depo and.... :))))
At the initial stage it is enough to protect the last order, because it is the highest and the loss comes from it. But this raises the problem of early exit...
I think the lot size distribution should be in reverse order, i.e. from maximum to minimum....
exit, as far as I remember, by trailing stop
I think the lot size distribution should be in reverse order, i.e. from maximum to minimum....
Exit, as far as I remember, by trailing stop
If you make the orders decreasing instead of increasing, the EA will lose its meaning. And the exit is not by trailing stop but by moving stop.
If you make the orders decreasing rather than increasing, the EA loses its meaning. And the exit is not by trailing stops, but by moving stops.
Stop moves when the next level triggers... If the level triggers and then the price turns towards the stop, then the maximum lot kills the profit that was earned before...
The stop moves when the next level triggers... if the level triggers and then the price reverses to the stop, the maximum lot kills the profit...
If you have a trailing stop instead of moving stop, do you think the result will be better? In my opinion, it should and quite significantly. And if trailing stop is secured beforehand, i.e. it switches on (jumps) when it passes its value - in break-even point.
Думаю, что распределение величины лотов должно быть в обратном порядке, т.е. от максимального к минимальному
И самый крупный откроется на вершине, за несколько пипсов до того, как рынок развернется...