NATURAL INTELLIGENCE as the basis of a trading system - page 26

 
Konstantin, it's probably simpler here: you can withdraw most of your hard-earned money each month - starting with a clean slate each month...
 
Mathemat:
Konstantin, it's probably simpler here: you can withdraw most of your hard-earned money each month - starting with a clean slate each month...


Yeah, that's true...but I don't think there's any point in carping by the computer day after day,
if you can take 50-100 pips and double your deposit every week...
It's so easy to open an account at VTB and earn millions in two or three months,
I can help wild animals, for example, I help them in the wilderness!
I, for example, help wild animals (it's a pity we are killing the planet in full).
 

Yes,MATEMAT is right.I constantly withdraw money from the trading account ...Just "launder" (you know what country we live in) not any amount, without attracting the attention of the tax authorities.And the DC will not seek to put you down.If you have not worrying about the possibility to take advantage of such kind of profit, you may say that they are good at taking an order and they do not want to slip it into their hands.

I see just a blatant aggression addressed to me. I don't dare to bother you anymore, let alone provoke negative reactions. This time I will definitely leave the forum. I will spend my time for a more pleasant dialog in some other place. Good luck to everybody, gentlemen. And smile more often, because you are so loaded that you don't even understand humor (it's about the concept of "gensek").

 
ballistika:

I see just blatant aggression addressed to me. I dare not disturb you any more, much less provoke negative reactions. This time I will definitely leave the forum. I will find time for a more pleasant dialogue elsewhere. Good luck, gentlemen. And smile more often, otherwise you are so loaded that you do not understand humor (it's about declension of the term HENSEK).


Do not leave us ... we have only love and tenderness for you. ...
But I have an absolutely serious question (in case I catch you at the door), does your system work in 2004-2005 ...?!
 

There you go, okay, I'm a boot in life and my jokes are military. But you gentlemen, you are better than that, such a girl missed out :((((((. You have a good hostess, she wrote a post and cleaned up after herself, and you have attacked her. :)))

 
Prival:

There you go, okay, I'm a boot in life and my jokes are military. But you gentlemen, you are better than such a girl missed :((((((. You have a good hostess, she wrote a post and cleaned up after herself, and you have jumped on her. :)))



+1
 

Hello, men! The light scuffle to which we are all accustomed here, as a means of communication for women is not suitable in principle. Temper your ardour.

ballistika:

I doubt very much about the seriousness of what's going on here. There are so many of them in the Russian Duma - and the war in Chechnya has not yet been stopped ... And they say everything is right and Putin is doing a great job ...


Angela, actually the forum is just the place where people talk: argue, share impressions, ideas, trading strategies, etc.. No one does business here. Everyone does everything by himself. And forex is a thing that not everyone can talk about it. And certainly not natural intelligence. So do not be too harsh.

ballistika:

I put my comments in a thread where I saw my old friends, whom I know and respect - and just to wish them a Merry Christmas and a "present" thrown in. Yes, yes. Personally, I'm using this method, at least double the deposit - weekly, and - in geometric progression monthly - and the REAL account.


Angela, not so long ago you were trading another strategy. It also gave some results, but its time has passed. Now you trade by this one, but be sure its time will pass. Maybe, by that time you will come up with a third one and so on. What am I saying? Perhaps you have a talent for being in phase with the market, in full accordance with that Chinese proverb. But there's a BUT. Never, under no circumstances will you be able to transfer your method to any one person. Why? Because, in addition to your perfectly clear explanations, you are missing one small, quite weightless, detail - the intangible that comes to your mind, it is perceived as certain signals, and is implemented in the form of actions. It comes to you, but not to the other. And the one to whom it comes, does not need your system, he has his own.

For this very reason, what is clear to one is dark forest to another. And this applies not only to Forex, but to everything in this world. This is what the discussion in this thread was about. For the same reason also Niroba known to all here indeed sees something in Elliott Waves, but cannot explain it to anyone. Not even to himself, that is why he sits without an expert.

Thank you, of course, for your frankness, but perhaps it is premature. Everyone has to go their own way, you know that. Why do you tempt people with geometric progressions? I think you have more difficult tasks than us. We still need to think about how to make money, and you - how to spend, how to dispose of. It's much easier to get caught up in this than in earning. You know what I mean. :-)

komposter:
Yurixx, try to formalize at least one impulse "from ballistics".
Specifically - why it starts and ends exactly where it starts and ends. And why the "correction" in the process of impulse formation often reaches 100%. And then say "very clear" ;)


Andrew, no doubt this is not an easy task. No doubt for programming the problem statement is not suitable. However, the point is that ballistika trades with hands and offers the same to us. Therefore there is still a moment of intuition-feeling there. From this point of view, they are 'very clear'.

Note, quite and quite are different things. In mathematics, quite=full, and quite as a term does not exist at all. In my interpretation, quite = rather more than less. :-))

 
Yurixx:
komposter:
And then say "very clear" ;)

Note, very and quite are different things. In mathematics, quite=full, and quite as a term does not exist at all. In my interpretation, quite = more rather than less. :-))

Yeah, very unfortunate... ;)
Just don't call it a system.

Or is it a "systematized intuition"? Like the omens - "a thunderstorm in the right side"...?
 
_|____|____|____|____|__
___|____|бицца|____|____
_|____|| galavoi |____|__
___|____|сюда|____|____
_|____|____|____|____|__
 
Implex:

_|____|____|____|____|____|
___|____|бицца|____|____|
_|____| galavoi |____|____|
___|____|сюда|____|____|__
_|____|____|____|____|____|


If only it worked :-) Or maybe the wall is wrong or the forehead is so military :-)