You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
after getting the new build all EAs are off the charts.
Last build dated November 4th 1455
Win 7 64x
reloaded again now the terminals won't start :-),
MetaTrader finished its work
before that a window popped up - MetaEditor finished its work
Please specify more details: build, bit mode of terminal, type, bit mode of operating system (this data can be taken from terminal "Journal" tab - after restarting the terminal, the first three lines).
2016.11.06 19:05:05.735 Terminal Windows 7 Ultimate (x64 based PC), IE 11.00, RDP, AMD Phenom II X4 955 Processor, RAM: 10625 / 12287 Mb, HDD: 840124 / 953866 Mb, GMT+03:00
2016.11.06 19:05:05.733 Terminal MetaTrader 5 x64 build 1463 started (MetaQuotes Software Corp.)
recompiled in the last Editor - same song, EAs are not loaded on the chart.
Although on second computer all is ok
2016.11.06 18:04:04.336 Terminal Windows 7 Ultimate (x64 based PC), IE 11.00, Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz, RAM: 21490 / 32684 Mb, HDD: 594755 / 1907721 Mb, GMT+02:00
2016.11.06 18:04:04.336 Terminal MetaTrader 5 - RoboForex x64 build 1463 started (ROBOFOREX LP)
1 - first computer - purely for terminals, only closed code there - but manually compiled and copied to new build
2 - second computer, all terminals have open code, i.e. the terminal recompiles its expresses before launching
even the standard expres do not go
2016.11.06 19:12:16.754 ExpertMACD invalid EX5 file (533)
copied open Expert code, reloaded terminal, got this:
I open MetaEditor - compile, compiler crashes.
Yes, there is a problem specifically on AMD processors (all is ok on Intel). We will issue an update on Monday morning.
Sorry about that, please. We missed it and luckily it's a test beta to run-in on our demo.
As a solution, put the official build on top of the beta. All data will be saved.
Renat Fatkhullin, are there any plans to introduce void and pointers for fundamental types, typedef and class typing for templates like in C++?
None of the dangerous references will be unambiguous.
We are gradually extending templates. But without any fanaticism - the contrivance of language constructions is not the goal for us.
None of the dangerous references will be unambiguous.
We are gradually extending the templates. But without fanaticism - the contrivance of language constructs is not a goal for us.
It's good that templates are being extended, but what extensions have been introduced this year, where can I read about them? And typedef and class typing for templates I would like to see, without them some things look rough.