On one application of the OOP - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why so? There are "stock trading"," forexanalysis " and so on.
Recently, there was a moment when it was claimed from the "podium" that only mql5 is discussed here - but somehow the "podium" quickly agreed that mql4 can also be discussed.
Maybe the "site is only about mql" part is not the official interpretation of the resource theme?
Well, I said - it is a site about autotrading. I was told by a moderator that it's only about IDPs. Then he deleted his posts and the entire thread. Many amicably supported him - like his, hut, hut.
The moderator is an official representative. He is an expert - he knows best.
MKL doesn't suit my needs, it's too weak. I am using the external functionality, and MKL is unable to interact with its API. Well, I don't want to write all the algorithms myself, especially the ones already written. And I guess I can't - it's the result, not the process, that counts.
ZS Well, it's up to the lamp. If I get banned, I'll just read, although it is more interesting to communicate.
So I said - the site is kind of about auto-trading. The moderator told me it was only about MCL. Then he deleted his posts and the whole thread. Many people cheered him on - as if to attack him, attack him.
The moderator is an official representative. He is a specialist - he knows best.
MKL doesn't suit my needs, it's too weak. I use external functionality, and my MKL cannot interact with its API.
SZY Well, it's up to the light bulb. If I get banned, I will just read, although it is more interesting to communicate.
They say on English-speaking branch -- there is no such a straightforward and one-sided authoritarianism.
Why on the Russian branch is an exception - is not clear.
p.s. For me -- prohibition of discussion of strategies without relevance to mql is either kinks or a private opinion -- but I doubt that it was an official position of the resource -- otherwise how to explain the name of the forum section"stock trading", "forexanalysis".
They say on the English-language branch -- there is no such straightforward and one-sided authoritarianism.
Why there is such an exception on the Russian branch is not clear.
Yes, I have. There are articles on interaction with various software, including Sharp. But all of these are crutches - awkward, skewed.
It seems to depend on qualification of modders. Their terminals are a dime a dozen. Marketing, though.))
p.s. For me -- banning discussion of strategies without reference to mql -- is either overkill or a private opinion -- but I doubt that this is the official position of the resource -- otherwise how can one explain the name of the forum section"stock trading", "forexanalysis"
I told the moderator to delete all this nonsense for inconsistency)).
Well, the easiest solution - we should transferSergey Golubev to Russian branch -- and a moderator from Russian branch (he's the only one here) to English.
BecauseSergey Golubev is only in "humour" - he has a funny feeling when he visits Russian branch.
In general, the easiest solution - should be transferred to the Russian branch ofSergey Golubev-- and a moderator from the Russian branch (he is one of us) to English.
He doesn't speak English.)) But Google will help.
I'd love to hang out in the Anglophone branch. I can understand it, but it's hard to write.
He doesn't speak English.)) But Google will help.
I'd love to hang out in the Anglophone branch. I can understand, but I can barely write.
So we need all our little gop-team to go to the English branch.Sergey Golubev is there -- he knows Russian.
There are some historical parallels when the "climate" made people move to new lands and diasporas were created there.
It will be the same for us -- there will be a "Russian branch in emigration" on the English branch until better times.
So we should all go to the English branch with our little gop-team.Sergey Golubev is there - he knows Russian.
There are historical parallels, when the "climate" forced to move to new lands - diasporas were created there.
We will have "Russian branch in emigration" on English branch till better times.
I'd love to hang out in the English section. I can understand, but it's hard to write.
))
Actually, all this talk about MCL or not MCL is in this thread for a reason. If to understand what OOP is - it is of course classes, inheritance, encapsulation, etc., but this is not the purpose of OOP. First of all, OOP is made with the purpose of "code reuse" (quote) - this is the main thing in OOP. Not by accident that in many books the description of OOP advantages starts with a secretary opening Excel and using it to prepare documents for all the materials no matter where and in what they are created (the book on Borland C++ 4.5). I.e. classes etc. are not an end in themselves, but a means.
Unfortunately, we have been left with an end in itself, while the means hasn't been given. The illusion of OOP was created.