You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The question then arises: can it be argued that the MT participated in the contest to trade hands - but tried to cheat the system by giving the appearance of fair trading? (Without knowing that it would all be reflected in the MT statistics)
Of course YES. For example, there are contests for manual trading, and there are brokers who give a certain amount of money to trade with the condition that the trade will be manual only.
No. You can't say that because he doesn't know the solution, but he is trying to do it... I do not know. In such cases the order simply does not open.
He can simply be taken off the course without any explanation. For he has not risked his own money.
But you can always press the buttons on one terminal on the other )))).
He can simply be taken off the course without any explanation. For he has not risked his own money.
But you can always press the buttons on one terminal at another )))).
I have crumpled up my answer a bit. If you try to use an Expert Advisor or a script on this account, it will not lead to anything.
Through API? But why do we need it from another one? The control is not the function of the code in general, but the trade orders. Perhaps, we can do it directly.
Does anyone have a class that can simulate manual trading in an EA (need to trade when auto-trading is prohibited)
Is this even possible? Only if a third-party tool, like an autoclicker script, is used...
Please advise if I imitate manual trading in the Expert Advisor, will there be no problems with execution of commands to open and close orders?
I used to trade with a broker a long time ago who had some technical problems (either the Expert Advisor did not work properly or the broker did not open the order correctly) - it ended up that the order opened in the other direction (instead of SELL it opened BUY and vice versa).
I've never had any problems with this broker when I was trading with my hands.
They don't have any effect on the market, they don't have any signals. If you have bad luck with brokerage companies on the Forex market, change your brokerage company. If you do not know what to do and you do not know how to do it, you cannot be sure when you are dealing with them. I have never had any problems with withdrawal. But there was a problem with one brokerage company. I think I got in trouble with them when I got acquainted with them - I told them to go away immediately, and they were only interested in how they got "burned". I think that the market we use is the most reliable one.
And imitate manual trading will be difficult, because when you request an order opening there may be a delay in response (we do not consider the reason), as a result of which the price has changed and requested confirmation of order execution at the new price. The robot will not read the message and will give a new request to open the order. After several such attempts, you will get a ban. Not all servers can cope with such frequent requests and the anti-virus will consider such robot's activity as a DOS-attack. This can happen in any market - just do not use robots that constantly send requests and you will be happy.
Just don't use robots that request prices from the server every tick instead of taking them from the terminal - then you won't get in trouble for using the robot.