The future of MQL5 is MQL5+ or even MQL6 - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Suggestions on MetaEditor appear year after year, the same ones, even "in pictures" in 2011:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/2582/page3#comment_57696
And parallel branches on how to bolt MQL to Visual Studio, Notepad++ etc. )))
There was even a poll on folding in that distant 2011: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/2931
Conclusions, gentlemen and ladies.
- Add the possibility to trade several accounts from a single terminal. Of course, with the possibility of easy program access to each account.
- Make a more complete version of the stock exchange tester - with the ability to test at least on the independently collected data full orders log - for tumbled strategies.
I wonder if the developers will keep their word or not :)
link: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/61066/page4#comment_1740946
(Hyperlink does not work)
Wishes on the subject of social trading:
s.w. About MQL5 - no need to touch it. There's nothing wrong with the language. Understand, the popularity of the platform doesn't depend on whether or not there's a focus or not. Popularity (in the social sense) depends on three things:
- The elite. That around which the community of traders is formed. At the moment, it has safely destroyed itself on this resource. Because in its time, the administration has staked on faceless "masses". What good is this mass of under*#(@? Seriously discuss trailing stops or MACD indicators? Now the elite may be some stars or cool algotraders with their schools, lectures, etc., etc. But where are they? - I'll tell you where: they are on other resources, because they are more interesting there.
- Self-expression. A place where people can express themselves. What we have in fact: a forum of very narrowly focused "programmers". Discussion is mainly on the topic of who needs what canvasses and how to turn a rectangular button into a round one. But how can a non-programmer express himself here? A person who does not care about all this programming stuff.
- The trick. This is what makes a resource unique. Smartlab has personal blogs of ordinary traders. Old good finam (before it self-destructed and turned into seedy whotrades) has blogs of some traders on statistics, quantitative analysis (I still have some entries in my stash). The old MQL4 forum also had its own thing: these are specific people Mathmat, Leo, Ananimus, Avals. Their mathematical calculations, systematic approach, MathCad charts and "level" discussion. But now this is gone, and unfortunately I don't see any new ones.
I apologize for the harshness, but after all, this is not the first year on the forum.That's not a bad suggestion. We all chip in $10 each, freelance a job to a developer. Notepad++.
And we'll have MetaEditor++ )))
Add to MetaEditor-e a possibility to collapse/uncollapse pieces of code, like in other programs. Then you won't have a sheet in front of your eyes, but everything will be compact.
Not a bad suggestion. Let's all pitch in together for $10, freelance a job to a Notepad++ developer. Notepad++.
And we'll have MetaEditor++))
Count me out, I'm fine without folding. ))
But seriously, what I desperately need in my language is a second mage for orders. Very often I get all sorts of setups and lockers, which build several grids, each of which needs to be followed independently of the others. And we need, first, to identify all orders of this EA and, second, to identify whether or not they belong to one or another group of open orders. The second Magic would be really helpful since we have to do a lot of work without it. But this is more relevant to Fours than to Fives.
Count me out, I'm fine without folding. ))
But seriously, what I desperately need in my language is a second majik for orders. Very often I get all sorts of setups and lockers, which involve building several grids, each of which needs to be followed independently of the others. And we need, first, to identify all orders of this EA and, second, to identify whether or not they belong to one or another group of open orders. The second Magic would be really helpful since we have to do a lot of work without it. But it concerns more the Fours than the Fives.
May I give you as much as you need? Write on a global level: Magic = 0; Megic = 123; Migic = 345; Mogic = 567; Mugic = 789;
This is an example, and you can write as many mogic for each group as you want. And you check it in cycles! It works fine! If this is a "perversion", sorry!