Expert Advisor <ALL DISCUSSIONS IN THE MARKET> - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you want the whole world to know about it, you should monitor a real account. Especially if you have a $10 account that you have tested, then the investment is minimal.
And you need monitors from different trading servers - that means you need to open at least three or four real accounts at different trading organisations.
And who knows how much a top bourgeois advisor costs and what his achievements are ?
What does this have to do with anything? The conversation was about the need for monitoring (multiple monitoring).
It's very simple, I want to see if my Expert Advisor can compete with the best bots from the bourgeoisie. I want to know what results they achieved, and what I have to do to outdo them.
So open a real account, connect it to the signals, and compare, I would also be interested to see how the tester grail breaks patterns
You are too much into the idea of test grails. First of all, the algorithm of the Expert Advisor is more important. And as everyone knows, algorithms are created not for tests, but for real markets. And if an EA in a tester loses money in the real market, it will lose even faster. And to successfully pass the test for 17 years with a drawdown of 1.8%, you need to backtrack 10 times. I know the capabilities of my EA, but I haven't seen any "bourgeois" grails.
You're too stuck on the idea of tester grails. First of all, the algorithm of the Expert Advisor is more important. And as everyone knows, algorithms are created not for testers, but for real markets, and if an EA fails in a tester, it will fail in the real market even faster. And to pass the test successfully in 17 years with 1.8% drawdown, you need to backtrack 10 times. I know my EA's capabilities, but I haven't seen any "bourgeois" grails.
How much longer are you going to be fooling around )))) (If you don't mind, don't try to put a pig in a poke, or should I give you some money for a cent account? - If you do not have a live monitoring, your words are worthless, don't you get it?
I have also added - take a no deposit bonus from brokers, 80% of brokers give a total sum of money which may turn into millions in 17 years, isn't it so? But no, you have to go with the tester - the tester does not make any money
Everyone is too much in thrall to the idea of test grails. First of all, the algorithm of the Expert Advisor is more important. And as everyone knows, algorithms are created not for tests, but for real markets. And if an EA in a tester loses money in the real market, it will lose even faster. And to successfully pass the test for 17 years with a drawdown of 1.8%, you need to backtrack 10 times. I know my EA's capabilities, but I haven't seen any real bourgeois ones.
How many trades in 17 years?