![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
On top of that, they can also rent it out - in short, a gold mine
On top of that, they can also rent it out - in short, a gold mine
So it was you so vehemently advocated that I buy your creation? Well, give me a link to your test run or monitoring from the beech.I'll try to understand why my system is worse or better.And in general I have long needed employees to promote my systems to the West. We can combine forces and business will run smoothly. I am sick and tired of watching our citizens bow before foreign advisers and strategies. I'm 1000% sure our systems are better than any foreign automated trading monsters.
And when did I ever give you a headache? Monitors are a lure for greedy people who don't understand what an EA's algorithm is and don't understand what different market phases are.
Monitoring shows the real state of affairs, not fairy tale tests. But you stubbornly do not listen to or do not hear a few people who are telling you the need to monitor a real account.
This is your opinion.But I'll tell you simply.If an EA on a real account for 1 year will be profitable and in the tester on a period of 2 years it loses, then I will never consider it good. I've seen hundreds of two years of successful EAs that were losing after a month like on command. And the reason is that either the strategy is not durable or Set file was picked up on a short testing period.
Well, go ahead and test it - the testing can be speeded up with the cloud:MQL5 Cloud Network accelerates calculations
Are these super accurate quotes? And what year do they start from? I found only 1999.01.12 in Alpari.
This is your opinion.But I'll tell you simply.If an EA on a real account for 1 year will be profitable and in the tester on a period of 2 years it loses, then I will never consider it good. I've seen hundreds of two years of successful EAs that were losing after a month like on command. The reason is that either the strategy is not long-lived, or Set file was chosen on a short testing period, and only inexperienced traders may be delighted with one-year successful monikers.Those who create strategies and Expert Advisors have different conclusions and arguments.
You should first read the article and then, if you don't understand, ask questions.