![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Have you guys heard of gaps? Read the regulations on gap execution of stops on your favourite cent-standards and classics.
What is n and R?
R is the radius.
Radius of what?
deposits
Will there be drawings from the tester today?
Here's the antimartin on top, the original expert below. The EA was hastily made yesterday, on 2 machines. Not many trades, as they are on H4.
As you see the profitability is higher, expected payoff is higher, recovery factor is higher, the relative drawdown is lower. Only the maximal drawdown is higher for the anti-martin, but it is natural: - an EA with increasing lot and an EA without increasing lot should be compared by the recovery factor - net profit/maximum drawdown.
Here's the antimartin on top, the original expert below. The EA was hastily made yesterday, on 2 machines. Not many trades, as they are on H4.
As you see the profitability is higher, expected payoff is higher, recovery factor is higher, the relative drawdown is lower. Only the maximal drawdown is higher for the anti-martin, but it is natural: - an EA with increasing lot and an EA without increasing lot should be compared by the recovery factor - net profit/maximum drawdown.
You don't need to prove it. Check it out.
Let's take an eagle/retail system - the equivalent of each outcome is either P (profit) or L (loss). Commission, types of orders and swaps - we do not.
So, for example, we simply take a series of 4 events (out of the blue). Then we have 2^4 = 16 outcomes
1) P, P, P, P
2) L, L, L, L
3) P, P, P, L.
4) P, P, L, P
5) P, L, P, P
6) L, P, P, P
7) P, P, L, L
8) P, L, P, L
9) L, P, P, L
10) L, L, P, P
11) L, P, L, P
12) P, L, L, P
13) L, L, L, P
14) L, L, P, L
15) L, P, L, L
16) P, L, L, L
Run each outcome through a super-duper MM system (ala "safe martini", "profitable anti-martini" etc.). Rules are very diverse (just have to work equally for each outcome) - for example "increase volume of the next transaction by 1.7 *number of previous profits, if there were two consecutive losses". For each outcome we obtain its own figure of loss/profit - X. Add up all Xn: X1+X2+...+X16 = 0. If you don't have zero, recalculate again before running for the Nobel.
Any MM on simple binary game - lost/win, for series of any length - by total is always neutral, neither winning nor losing.