![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The market is not physics and physics is not the market.
If it is a silly picture, the claim is to the meta-quotes, such pictures are created in a detailed report.
To me, all these theories, incomprehensibly created, seem like air locks. I usually dig through the data in the hope of finding something. And then I study the empirical material. What Yusuf is doing here is clearly some kind of philosopher's stone search.
They probably have it as text in their report, they are not stupid. But you - without specifying real or demo, rubles or dollars, etc. etc. - It's silly.
Please don't pull a Gaussian on the market. The market does not have a normal distribution, although it is similar. The example does not count. The exact match requirement is not met.
Have you never once withdrawn a trading result report from the terminal?
I prefer to withdraw the money.
I prefer to withdraw my money.
Misha, less of a whammy. Your little signal, so far, is nothing. You do realise that 80 trades is on the brink of statistical error. One week of monitoring, that's nothing squared. And an initial deposit is like going to the market to buy sunflower seeds. Do you really think you'll last more than a month on five thousand rubles? With the kind of risk you're taking, it's just a game of eagle at school, not a physics model.
Don't bring multigasina into this. It's got nothing to do with it. It's the market.
Misha, less of a whammy. Your little signal, so far, is nothing. You do realise that 80 trades is on the brink of statistical error.
These are two completely equal approaches to doing science. In the USSR, your approach was more common at the non-theoretical level, of course: digging through data, making experiments, and sucking a hypothesis out of them. In the West, the reverse process is more common: first a hypothesis is stated, then an experiment is planned to confirm or disprove it.
In general, I agree!
I am a deita miner, but not a scientist, and I don't have a background in physics. But I am developing in the process of acquiring knowledge and practice.
As for hypothesising, I'm sure you have to have a good expert knowledge of the subject and intuition for that. Well, of course, 90% of mcl users will consider themselves experts and start testing hypotheses that are essentially speculation.
There you go ) Thanks ).