The axioms of financial market analysis (or the whole truth about the right and wrong use of indicators) - page 15

New comment
 
Useddd:

Somehow there is still something missing in your words. You consider only two sides, but what about MM, it balances this imbalance to a certain extent.

It provides liquidity, so that those who want to sell can always sell, and those who want to buy - buy. Even if at that moment there are not equal numbers of those who want to sell and buy at the same price.

This alignment is undertaken by MM, of course not infinitely. As a consequence, he adjusts the price. Roughly speaking, he "trades" with us (sellers and buyers), in accordance with his policy,

and in accordance with the resulting supply/demand he sets the rate. Where it is seen openly that someone wanted to buy for 2, but they were offered 2.5. They both were satisfied at one time and this price will show later during the internal analysis inside MM that there is an imbalance and according to this imbalance the price will be set by MM itself. + MM regulates his own game, he can set the price too low relative to the real level of supply/demand.

So he on demand and buys from all comers, thereby CREATING this imbalance, is it so difficult to think of it?)

All orders are filled and everyone is happy)

 
Useddd:

Am I getting this right? Or do you have a slightly different idea?

Decided on the market 1000 people to sell (albeit by 1 contract) the pound futures. Appeared in the cup
1000 bids (the order in which they appear in the market - may be different, depending on the pings) to sell, the speed of their execution
depends on the MM (if there are no bids now, the MM will buy, providing liquidity,
providing the client with confidence that if the client wants to sell or buy, there will always be
to buy or sell, i.e. providing client's assurance that there always will be some buyers (who will satisfy his needs).
It turns out that 1000 contracts are sold and bought in a certain period of time - in the bid, as well as in the ask 1001,
but bids and asks are placed in the market and the traded volume will be on the ask.
In other words, you have bought more, goods have decreased and the price has increased. But there is also the total traded volume.
for example, the traded amount on an asca 1001 on a bidet 1 000, or on an asca 2001 on a bidet 2001, and in both cases
the delta is the same in both cases, but trading intensity is twice as intensive. It is also important to look at the order line itself. If you trade intensively
There are a lot of orders both to buy and to sell, but it is not clear who is gaining volume - the buyer or the seller.
I wonder HOW the orders appear on the feed, by HOW much volume and how often, and what is their LOCATION,
how orders were placed and by what volume.

For those who deal in volumes I think it is all important.

If you buy or sell, and there is no counterparty to the transaction, there is ALWAYS an MM on the other side. The tape is only used for intraday trading, scalping or tracking action around important levels. The big buyer can do whatever he wants, he can send a large order and the price will fly away, then sell out and buy again at the initial level, or buy in small orders gradually, it does not matter.

That's what the pound situation was at the end of January/beginning of February:

There was no supply and there mm was just buying back everything and everyone willing.

 
stranger:

Why go so deep, if someone is selling or buying and there is no counterparty to the trade, there is ALWAYS an MM on the other side for that instrument. The tape is only used for intraday trading, scalping or tracking action around important levels. A large buyer can gain volume any way he wants, he can throw a large order and the price will fly away, then sell out and buy back at the initial level, he can gain in small orders gradually, it does not matter.

What is more important then, recognising these "little things"?
 
Useddd:
What is more important then, recognising these little things?
I have said for the hundredth time that the most important thing is to identify the important price levels where this imbalance occurs and to identify it not retrospectively but in real time.
 

Here's a screenshot for the 28th of January, you can clearly see that there is no one below 49:

 
"if there are no bidders now, MM will buy back, providing liquidity".

Liquidity is provided by limit orders. A trade is a consequence of liquidity
 
Useddd:

Somehow there is still something missing in your words. You consider only two sides, but what about MM, it balances this imbalance to a certain extent.

It provides liquidity, so that those who want to sell can always sell, and those who want to buy - buy. Even if at that moment there are not equal numbers of those who want to sell and buy at the same price.

This alignment is undertaken by MM, of course not infinitely. As a consequence, he adjusts the price. Roughly speaking, he "trades" with us (sellers and buyers), in accordance with his policy,

and in accordance with the resulting supply/demand he sets the rate. Where it is seen openly that someone wanted to buy for 2, but they were offered 2.5. They both were satisfied at one and the same time, it would be seen in the price after the internal analysis inside MM that there was an imbalance and according to this imbalance the price would be set by MM itself, by the way also at once. + The price will then be shown by an internal analysis inside the MM and according to this imbalance the price will be set by the MM itself, by the way, right away.

There are different MM's - black white red :-D

If we are talking about banks - they just hold their own certain levels. They don't resolve any imbalances. They simply inject liquidity in a certain range.
If we are talking about Puppet, he may act differently. He can also work something out in his favour. He may pretend to do one thing, but actually mean the opposite :) The main thing is to learn to see it all and not get caught.
 
mmmoguschiy:
There are different types of MM - black white and red :-D.

As for the banks - they just hold their own at certain levels. They do not correct any imbalances. They simply inject liquidity in a certain range.
If we are talking about Puppet, he may act differently. He can also work something out in his favour. He may pretend to do one thing, but actually mean the opposite :) The main thing is to learn to see it all and not get caught.

Really? They just leave the national currency to fend for itself and don't give a damn?

Instead of talking bullshit, they should have thought about how to put it into practice.

 
stranger:
Really? They're just throwing the national currency to the mercy of fate and don't give a shit?
At least that's what they claim :-D free floating and all that...
 
stranger:

Instead of talking rubbish, you'd better think about how to put it into practice.

To apply something, you have to have it. So far, everything said above is 90 percent true bullshit.
1...8910111213141516171819202122
New comment