ECN, order execution, aggregators, liquidity. - page 20

New comment
 
Rann:
Yes, if you do that. But most people only look at spreads, which is what companies take advantage of.
And how do you look at the payment as a percentage of profit, fixing a certain minimum, rather than what is customary. After all, this is clearly an inadequate business model that makes it unprofitable for a trader to trade on small movements and at the same time the company's profit is too small on large movements.
 
Andrei01:
What do you think about the payment being a percentage of profit, fixing a certain minimum rather than the customary minimum. After all, this is clearly an inadequate business model that makes it unprofitable for a trader to trade on small movements and at the same time the company's profits are too small on large movements.
Yes, exactly! And let the losses be compensated.
 
MetaDriver:
Yes, that's right! And let the losses be compensated.
And the spread is negative!
 
Contender:
And the spread is negative!

Let's postpone the spread for now... :)

I am surprised at the logic, or rather illogic, of this fellow (Andrei01).

He asserts nonsense with moral pathos behind his back, without even doubting his "iron logic" and under the guise of fighting for "justice". (!) :) :)

Not not noticing the obvious things: such a proposal is easy to implement on their own - just trading a smaller (by the proposed percentage) lot.

// It's even more profitable - losses are also compensated automatically, and the margin deposit is lower.

Miracles.

 
Andrei01:
What do you think about the payment being a percentage of profit, fixing a certain minimum rather than the customary minimum. This is clearly an inadequate business model that makes it unprofitable for the trader to trade on small movements and at the same time the company's profit is too small on large movements.
With such a scheme there is no place to overlap and you can do anything in the kitchen. Some companies, on the other hand, give back, for example, commissions from trades that are lost.
 

MetaDriver:

Without noticing the obvious: such an offer is easy to implement on your own - simply by trading a smaller (by the suggested percentage) lot.

It wasn't about lots. Read it carefully.
 
Rann:
With such a scheme, there is nowhere to overlap and anything can be done in the kitchen. Some companies, on the other hand, give back commissions from drained trades, for example.
The overlap will be where it used to be. We are talking about a percentage of profit payment model, where smaller trades pay less than larger ones, but larger ones pay much more, and smaller ones will have larger trading volumes to compensate for the lower fee.
 
MetaDriver:

Let's postpone the spread for now... :)

They are right and left to concentrate on the real issue of fair play and not on anti-fraud.

He is deluding us with moral pathos and nonsense, without even doubting his "iron logic", under the guise of fighting for "justice". (!) :) :)

Not not noticing the obvious things: such a proposal is easy to implement on their own - just trading a smaller (by the proposed percentage) lot.

// It's even more profitable - the losses are also compensated automatically, and the margin deposit is lower.

Miracles.

oh come on )

the guy is trolling and is happy to be answering back

But he is running out of fantasy and has already started offering to pay a percentage of trader's profit )

 
Andrei01:
on the larger ones the fee is much higher, and on the smaller ones there will be higher bidding volumes to compensate for the lower fee.
abassaka
 
Mischek:

The man is stupidly trolling and is happy to make him reply

And he's already trolled for eight credits!

1...131415161718192021222324252627...35
New comment