Who has already tried the Signals subscription to get on the tail of ATC 2012 participants? - page 19

New comment
 
C-4:
To do this, it is sufficient to synchronise the net positions.

OK, let it be amended.

The purpose of the service is to synchronise net positions, not signals.
 
The investor is not interested in when the position was opened or how long it will be held. The investor is interested in the profit per unit of time. If we accept this postulate, everything immediately falls into place, all synchronisation problems disappear, and there is no need to invent another "butter butter" under the good intention of keeping the investor from investing.
 
Reshetov:
Are you in the right head? If two positions are opened at different prices for the same instrument, but are closed simultaneously at the same price, the difference in pips between them will not disappear.
Do not consider it in points, but in % for a week, for example. Then everything will fall into place.
 
Reshetov:
Are you out of your mind? If two positions are opened at different prices for the same instrument, but are closed synchronously at the same price, the difference in pips between them will not disappear.

Yura. Once again, if the positions are opened at one point in time on the same instrument - they are open at the same price.

The synchronization moment is the moment of position opening in the slave. And the fact that the master's position was opened earlier can be easily trashed, and we can consider that his position was opened at the same moment.

Aren't you going to prove that from the moment the master opened the position and before the synchronization, it was better than after the synchronization? :) I think it makes no difference, while Renat believes it depends on the sign of profit on the position at the moment of synchronization. Why don't you fight with Renat?

 
Reshetov:
Are you in the right head? If two positions are opened at different prices on the same instrument, but are closed synchronously at the same price, the difference in pips between them will not disappear.

I'm fine. What about you? Once again an example for the gifted ones:

1 position opened on 01.02.2012 at the price of 1.2000 and closed on 03.02.2012 at the price of 1.4000

2 position is opened on 02.02.2012 at the price of 1.3000 and closed on 03.02.2012 at the price of 1.4000.

All positions are opened in one lot.

On 02.01.02.2012 the master account will receive 0.1000 pips * 1 lot or 10 000$.

On 02.02.2012 the Master will receive 0.1000 points * 2 lots or 20 000$. His total income will be 30 000$.

On the second date the master will be joined by a copyist. He will synchronize his position with the master and thus on 02.02.2012 he will have two lots bought at 1.3000.

By the third day, he will close the two lots at 1.4000. His profit will be 0.1000 * 2 = 20 000$. His profit for 02.02.2012 will be identical to the master's one for the same period. It will be natural for the investor that he did not earn the first 10 000 $, because on 01.02.2012 he was not involved in investing and could not earn them.

 
GlobalTrader:

Testing your new signal copying service. no trades are being copied.

Give me a more complete log from the terminal since it started, please.

 
St.Vitaliy:
You don't count in pips, but in % per week for example. Then everything will fall into place.
You can count in whatever you want. If there is a difference in pips, it will appear in % with the same sign. Only the ratio will change. The profit will not become a loss and the loss will not become a profit due to percentage conversions and other casual manipulations.
 
Renat:

Since there are not many readers who understand the open text, I will explain again.

Haste, disregard for clean entry, greed and recklessness we will not support, as it is to us that all the negativity and grievances of offended followers will return.

Wrong address.


The most important goal of our service is to prevent stupid losses and protect traders from system losses. This goal is a hundred times more important than any technical desires or requirements of anyone.

That is, nothing beats protecting your account and preventing mistakes.

Very well-intentioned. Very approving.


The matter is closed.

Yeah. Well, what can you do? We'll just have to keep it quiet for now. See if anyone has any insight. It's all good.
 
C-4:
........................... It will be natural for an investor not to have earned the first 10,000$, because as of 01.02.2012 he did not participate in the investment and could not have earned it.
Everything is absolutely certain.
 
MetaDriver:

Once again, if positions are opened at one point in time on the same instrument, they are open at the same price.

Again, for those who are particularly gifted:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Renat:


...

This is why the first step is to replicate master account positions, and replicate only if we can enter as well as the master's position. That is, we don't synchronise if at least one master position is on the plus side.

...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where Renat says that Provider and Subscriber positions must be opened at the same time and at the same price?

1...121314151617181920212223242526...83
New comment