Is martin so bad? Or do you have to know how to cook it? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...But the total volume should be within MM....
Are you sure you have a martin?
I think it's something else. If you have, say, 10% of deposit allocated for trading, then increasing/decreasing volume within this 10% is somehow wrong "in spirit" :)
PS I was talking about more classic options.
I don't know what to call it... I'm not good at that kind of terminology.
Anyway, I was just selling in this combination. The price went up and I sold again...
And martin is a run-up to 50-70-100% of the deposit? ))
...
PS I was talking about the more classic options.
And martin is an acceleration to 50-70-100% of the depo? ))
I guess it's not very interesting my personal attitude to the question, but interesting fact: if martin is nonsense, then why is the casino limited to the maximum bet amount?
Is the maximum bet amount when using a martin - or is the maximum bet amount simply limited?
The casino is not a bottomless barrel of money, the maximum amount depends on how full that barrel is, I think.
I guess I'm not really interested in my personal attitude to the question, but interesting fact: if martin is nonsense, then why is there a limit on the maximum bet amount in the casino?
Resource constraints are certainly an argument, but imho not the main one.
The limited resources of course the argument, but imho not the main.
of course
Martin rules in the casino and on the market.
and some people like TheXpert , try to reduce the conversation about Martin to mockery