You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's what I'm saying - as the quality of EA trading improves the need for MM like Martin decreases. Probably doesn't get to zero though. I haven't found out yet. Work in progress.
Let's be clear about what we mean. Whether or not a strategy involves raising the stakes to diversify risk and increase IR is considered a Martin. I think not, because Martin is a strategy that essentially involves nothing but raising the bet.
And you disable one of the inputs and look at the result.
Why is martin bad: During optimization parameters are selected so as to pass all the "bad" parts of the history and not to fail. And even a test on a long history does not guarantee that there will not be a series of losses.
Martin is a strategy that essentially involves nothing more than raising the stakes.