Has anyone wondered why and how much the trend building "walks"? - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Who can comment on this? Could this be the source of the problem?
I don't think so. What difference does it make what is the pixel size?
The price and time for each of the two anchor points are stored for the line. They have nothing to do with pixels.
Imho, just a botched attempt to explain the above bug.
Is refusing to scale a principle position?
What does it mean to refuse scaling? Explain, it's not at all clear what you mean.
________________
In short, it doesn't matter what scale -- hard or not, it still walks. Just checked.
1 Unlikely. What difference does it make what pixel size?
For a line, price and time are stored for each of the two anchor points. They have nothing to do with pixels.
Imho, just a lame attempt to explain the above bug.
2 What does it mean to refuse scaling? Explain, it's not at all clear what you mean.
1 I see, not it.
2 In chart properties - scaling in pips per bar, a new feature (not present in mt4), is in fan and arcs. If you use it, then the problem sort of stops being relevant, everything becomes hardwired.
Anyway, it doesn't matter what scale -- hard or not, it still sticks. I just checked.
Hmm. How did you check? I just have everything drawn dragging around the window, nothing sticks...
For the line, the price and time for each of the two anchor points are stored. They have nothing to do with the pixels.
Set hard, in points per bar. Does it keep changing? I don't.
I'm not saying there isn't a problem. I'm suggesting a solution. I'm fine with it.
Now TF on H4 and look at a 300-400 bar history.
Comfortable?
1 I see, not it.
2 In chart properties - scaling in pips per bar, a new feature (not present in mt4), is in fan and arcs. If you use it, the problem sort of stops being relevant, everything becomes hardwired.
and now TF on H4 and look at a 300-400 bar history.
Is it convenient?
Personally, I don't care. I use my own markers and charts for TFs, and do not use H4 at all.
LOL, caught these divergences, played with zoom and screen resolutions(including reloading), wanted to capture, all normal again.
Maybe trending when restarting the terminal somehow binds to other points, how to catch it dunno.
Personally, I don't care. I keep my own markups and charts for working timeframes, and I don't use H4 at all.
Don't suggest something you don't use )
Initially, it was about the customer's problem, if you remember. I suggested some kind of solution. I am using this solution myself, though to a limited extent, I don't switch the TF :)
I'm done with all this rubbish, scaling in general is a somewhat abstract topic.
(But it has an ideological basis ;)