Has anyone wondered why and how much the trend building "walks"? - page 5

New comment
 
stringo:
And what do you have in the settings in the charts tab "exact timeline"? Surely it must be ticked.

Yes, there is such a letter, it stands for "exact timeline jackal".

Tell me more about what this parameter is and what it's eaten with.

 
Urain:

Yes, there is such a letter, stands for "exact time jackal".

Tell me more about what this parameter is and what it's being eaten with.

This tick cancels the timeframe discretisation when reference points are snapped and displayed on the timescale
 
I unchecked and rebooted the terminal, but it didn't help.
Apparently the situation is a dead end after all.
 
I didn't have a tick mark on it. Sounds like magnetisation to me, need to check with zero.
 
Urain:
I unchecked it and rebooted the terminal, but it didn't help.
Apparently the situation is still a dead end.

1. Did you re-build?

2. Magnetization of 1 pixel is very low. You must have a steady hand, a sharp eye and a non-slipping mouse.

 
stringo:

1. Did you do the construction all over again?

2. Magnetising 1 pixel is very little. You have to have a steady hand, a keen eye and a non-slippery mouse.

Not before your post, but now I've redone it. The spread is down to 14 points.
 
It's the same with zero magnetisation. Ple, I'm out of ideas.
 
TheXpert:
Ple, I'm out of ideas.

Wipe the blood from your mouth - you're scary to look at. :)

...he was eating the brain of the developers of the terminal...

 
joo:

Wipe the blood from your mouth - you're scary to look at. :)

It's raspberry jam :) Misha got it from last year's supply :)
 

Yeah, the response is just impressive.

Is it that bad or has the bug been bluntly ignored?

If it's the latter, just say so. But then don't be offended :)

123456789
New comment