Discussing conflicts between programmers and customers. A discussion of ambiguous situations between the programmer and the client, and a rating of the most conflicted programmer performers. - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
At least 3 years of New Testament programming experience )
Think of the long and arduous way they came up with that wording))
brain washing for the programmer is guaranteed.
Those who think that refusing to say all the points in the terms of reference by voice and duplicating what is written by voice is an unnecessary waste of time are deeply mistaken. It turns out they decided that one type of communication is superior to the other, you guys are certainly good experts in their field, but do not think that the same specialists in other areas, but it is rather medicine and psychology, in the end did you conduct an experiment on the most optimal communication? For those who think they can do without voice I suggest the following experiment; during the day try to communicate with people around you with notes only, especially with the neighbour who lives one floor down and whom you flooded your flat.
You can only change my mind if you show me the beauty of the blue sky on your fingers. I'm sure the figure you depict will be far from any colour, let alone heavenly.
Tavaoosch, but what do you actually want from the forum?
Those who think it is an unnecessary waste of time to refuse to say all the points in the terms of reference by voice, and to duplicate what is written by voice, are deeply mistaken. It turns out they decided that one type of communication is superior to the other, you guys are certainly good experts in their field, but do not think that the same specialists in other areas, but it is rather medicine and psychology, in the end did you conduct an experiment on the most optimal communication? For those who think they can do without voice I suggest the following experiment; during the day try to communicate with people around you with notes only, especially with the neighbour who lives one floor down and whom you flooded your flat.
You can only change my mind if you show me the beauty of the blue sky on your fingers. I'm sure the figure you depict will be far from any colour, let alone the sky.
Any communication during the discussion of TOR is acceptable. Developing TOR goes through several stages: 1. Thinking. 2. Writing. 3. Checking, reflecting, clarifying. 4. Delivering the finished result.
The TOR is for the client, with some support from the developer, of course. But pro-norm the developer's time costs: 1. Sorting out the ToR. 2. Coding. 3. Making amendments.
The developer is willing to "parse the ToR", but not to think through the ToR together with the customer.
With a voice communication you involve the developer in the "thinking and writing TOR" phase. To parse TOR for written, to parse TOR for voice communication, to parse TOR for video - this is completely different time consumption.
Basically, if you want to negotiate TK only by voice, then finance by the hour. There's no problem.
Any communication during the discussion of the ToR is acceptable. There are several stages in the development of the ToR: 1. Reflection. 2. Writing. 3. Checking, reflecting, clarifying. 4. Delivering the finished result.
The TOR is for the client, with some support from the developer, of course. But pro-norm the developer's time costs: 1. Sorting out the ToR. 2. Coding. 3. Making amendments.
The developer is willing to "parse the ToR", but not to think through the ToR together with the customer.
With a voice communication you involve the developer in the "thinking and writing TOR" phase. To parse TOR for written, to parse TOR for voice communication, to parse TOR for video - this is completely different time consumption.
Basically, if you want to negotiate TK only by voice, then finance by the hour. There's no problem.
I am leading to the fact that this resource was the possibility of choosing which way will be consistent with the terms of reference, literally, is check the box "voice harmonization of items TK" "Only written communication" or "combined communication" and if someone does not like to communicate with the voice let him not call on this request. I would even pay extra just to use all possible information flows to finish the work quickly and understand each other!
They don't understand you.
They won't make voice communication an option because of you, you can communicate by voice anyway.
What do you want from the forum people?
You can only change my mind if you show me the beauty of the blue sky on your fingers. I'm sure the figure you depict will be far from any colour, let alone the sky.
They don't understand you.
They won't make voice communication an option because of you, you can communicate by voice anyway.
What do you want from the forum people?
I want customers to come and talk about problems with performers.
I want to work together to decide how to make customers more secure, in general, to create some semblance of a community of customers, if possible.
I want to continue to use this resource to create EAs, but have found a complete lack of customer protection.
What do you want?
I want customers to come in and talk about problems with performers.
I want to work together to decide how to make the customer more secure, generally to create some sort of customer community, if that is possible.
I want to continue to use this resource to create EAs, but have found the customer to be completely unprotected.
What do you want?
Is it on your fingers or in written words?