Discussing conflicts between programmers and customers. A discussion of ambiguous situations between the programmer and the client, and a rating of the most conflicted programmer performers. - page 31
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good answer. Can you do links?
Contractors will earn less, some customers will leave without selling, while others will simply leave the service area with $10 orders.
The market cannot be cheated
But both the customer and the contractor will approach the service more responsibly and raise the bar of requirements, 50 is certainly a lot, but here is an example:http://www.freelancer.com/jobs/Metatrader/
Orders are divided into three price zones 30-250 / 250-750 / 750 - 1500, and more.
And with the customer when creating the project and the performer, after he takes on the project the company takes a percentage, the number of bids is limited.
Of course, they charge them well but the level of their approach is completely different.
At the end of the project, the performer can leave a comment on the customer's review, which will also be visible.
I cannot say that everyone there is white and fluffy, but there is less dirt - that is a fact.
At the same time, both the client and the contractor will take a more responsible approach to the service, and the bar will be raised
There should be a qualification filter in the Jobs. Otherwise, Arbitrage, and then the forum will be flooded with 10-dollar snot. This trend is already there. The service will become uninteresting just for qualified developers. Because seeing themselves in the flow of dumping and fighting "who is cheaper" is not for everyone.
At the moment, you can 1) raise the bottom level of prices forced by the minimum barrier at least $ 30; 2) reformat the top is not by the number of completed jobs in the job, and taking into account the articles and code base 5ka + 4ka. This will increase the activity of 10-dollar workers to work on the development of the resource and improve their skills. It will also allow the "ancient" members of the 4ks to feel comfortable
3) Raise the percentage of deductions to the company, and from the performer to take after agreeing with the customer (a full agreement on the acceptance of work), then there will not be precedents with the return of money by the performer.
4) Oblige customers to write a sensible description, rather than what they write (two words, in repetition)
5) limit the number of bids executor - for a more responsible approach to each of the orders, rather than taking on an unmanageable burden with ensuing consequences
in general, more capitalize the service, then there will be money to pay for skilled arbitration, for example.
5) limit the number of performer bids - for a more responsible approach to each of the orders, rather than taking on an unmanageable load with the ensuing consequences
This is very important. Only thing to consider here is that active work also depends on the client. The work may be done, but it is in a sluggish testing phase. Therefore limit the amount of work that is at the stage of "Provision of a ready-made solution".
6) Show information about the stage at which a task is at
But both the customer and the contractor will be more responsible for the service, and the bar will be raised, 50 is certainly a bit much, but here's an example:http://www.freelancer.com/jobs/Metatrader/
Orders are divided into three price zones 30-250 / 250-750 / 750 - 1500, and more.
And with the customer when creating the project and the performer, after he takes on the project the company takes a percentage, the number of bids is limited.
Of course, they charge them well but the level of their approach is completely different.
At the end of the project, the performer can leave a comment on the customer's review, which will also be visible.
I cannot say that everyone there is white and fluffy, but there is less dirt - that is a fact.
At the moment, you can 1) raise the bottom level of prices forced minimum barrier of at least $ 30;
In the first place, where customers will go with the order - put me here for $ 10?
They will leave. And this was their first order, it would be followed by a dozen more.
Secondly, a bad programmer, the quality, if the lower price goes from 10 to 30 dollars, will not improve.
First of all, where will the customers go with the order - put me here for 10 dollars?
They will leave. And this was their first order, dozens more were bound to follow.
Secondly, a bad programmer will not raise the quality if the price goes from 10 to 30.
This is very important. The only thing to consider here is that active work also depends on the client. Work may be done, but it is in the sluggish testing phase. Therefore, limit the amount of work that is at the stage up to "Provision of a finished solution".
6) Show information on the stage the task is at
The customer should set their own deadlines, and if the performer agrees to "sluggish testing", it is their problem.
7) In the performer's report show statistics on sociability, meeting deadlines, conflicts... Yes, I would stupidly copied the whole system - it's pretty good.
Another site is good, it is competition. But there is no volume. That's why there is no market. You don't have to fight the market. You have to work with it.
Mykhal Potapych, such sites a huge carload, and on Ruzon, and on zabugra. So with the market all right. options, as orders and offers very different.
I just want it to be the best.
I have an idea. Orders up to a certain price level can be excluded from the Top. This would immediately overturn a dumping company and make it pointless to inflate the top with low prices.
Good point! +100500
Or add stats according to the price of the order.