You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Soon I'll be mercilessly killing OOP vs Procedures threads.
So kill it. You'll do it right :) . Or, better yet, make a topic for this cholivar and post it there.
_____
By the way (for the last time, honestly) usually in OOP fights everybody undeservedly forgets about encapsulation. If analogue of virtuality can be arranged in PP, with encapsulation everything is much more complicated.
Did you choose EURUSD and USDCHF based on the fact that these pairs go together? If so, why don't you say anything about it? And there is no guarantee that positions will be closed simultaneously on both pairs (or rather on the second pair, where it is required), and the point value is different. IMHO it is better to do an analysis on two pairs, and enter with your targets for each pair (if I understand your idea correctly).
Dear Yedelkin! I can send you a procedurally designed multicurrency kernel if you're interested (it works by open bar). The code is written for 4, but will work on 5 as well - you can compare the performance of both variants on it.
Yes, that's the idea. I agree that it's raw... was only cited as an example...
What's in the video has nothing to do with loci. Nor does it have anything to do with solving the problem of why loci are needed.
If we are talking about learning material. And also for beginners. Then the examples should be "classic" (established, tested and unquestionable). The student should master the material and not engage in a debate with you over "raw" dubious ideas. In such cases, you risk losing credibility as a teacher and losing "rapport" with the audience. "Raw" ideas are usually given as "information to think about", "homework".
abolk, I must have expressed myself incorrectly... My example is close to a typical one. I was referring more not to the crudity of the idea, but to the crudity of the implementation of the idea. So, the script does not take into account the point value of eurusd and usdchf... and some other things...
Abolk, I thank you personally for your criticism. It has given me a lot of constructive suggestions.
Dear forum users, a big request to you! In the branch created by the author, to discuss the topic !!!
After all, it is possible to create your own topics ... Including for trolling
abolk, I must have expressed myself incorrectly... My example is close to a typical one. I was not talking about the dampness of the idea, but rather about the dampness of the implementation of the idea. So, the script does not take into account the point value of eurusd and usdchf... and some other things...
Abolk, I thank you personally for your criticism. It has given me a lot of constructive suggestions.
that leaves you with a couple of completely stupid questions. How, who and what are you going to teach.
Can I describe your arguments in more details?
There's a broker called Hedge Total. They solved the locking problem in the 5th metatrader
solved very simply
introduced another instrument duplicating the main pair with the same bid and ask
but with a slightly different ending to the name.
You can buy one pair and sell another... Here's a LOCK for you...