Whether locking or counter positions are possible - page 10

New comment
 
Armen:
mt5 has already had so much invested in it that it won't be abandoned...
and there is no need to give up anything - there will just be one version of the terminal instead of two similar ones...
 

MetaDriver:

Plus add more of what's missing, like MT6.

MT6 is an obvious dead end, MT4+ is quite sufficient. People as it turns out don't really like revolutionary upheavals. ))
 
Laryx:

The point is that both in your case and without any lots - the positions will not be knocked out at the same time, but sequentially.

In the same way, you put two pending orders without any lots. As a result, you'll get one and then the other one. The line with or without any lots will be the same.

Locking the positions is a purely psychological trick, which allows us to feel that "we haven't lost the money", while the position that has been "locked" has actually been lost long ago. And waiting for the lock to "break" is the exact equivalent of closing the position and waiting for the pair to turn in a profitable direction.

Likewise
 
Laryx:

The point is that both in your case and without any lots - the positions will not be knocked out at the same time, but sequentially.

In the same way, you put two pending orders without any lots. As a result, you'll get one and then the other one. The line with or without any lots will be the same.

Locking the positions is a purely psychological trick, which allows us to feel that "we haven't lost the money", while the position that has been "locked" has actually been lost long ago. And waiting for the lock to "break" is the exact equivalent of closing the position and waiting for the pair to turn in a profitable direction.

It's not about the total position, but about the separate tracking of trades with their SL and TP, which is impossible to do with just one position... failure to understand this simple point by Metaquotes led to the collapse of MT5 in forex....
 
The mt5 strategies lose out massively in terms of their profitability.
 
trora:
You need to look at the rating of real-time strategies - mt5 and mt4, making a selection on profitability. and you will understand everything. mt5 is losing out in terms of profitability.

You mean "Signals"?

Then I'll tell you a terrible secret under the solemn undertaking that you will not reveal it to anyone: the rating does not show how many signals were lost, chasing the long ruble or quid. This is what the rating is all about: only those who have not yet gone off the rails are left in it.

 
Reshetov:

You mean "Signals"?

Then I'll tell you a terrible secret under the promise that you will not reveal it to anyone: the rating does not show how many signals were lost, chasing the long ruble or quid. That's why it's a rating, because only those who have not yet gone off the rails remain in it.

By the way, admins know statistics - how many demo signals were lost on mt4 and mt5... Ask them, maybe they'll tell you.
 
Reshetov:

You mean "Signals"?

Then I'll tell you a terrible secret under the promise that you will not reveal it to anyone: the rating does not show how many signals were lost, chasing the long ruble or quid. That's why it's a rating, because only those who have not yet gone off the rails remain in it.

That is, taking into account the free publication, the seller can multiply the number of different modifications of signals, including demo ones, and remove and add others as they fail, while remaining afloat all the time?
 
revers45:
That is, given the free publication, the seller can breed a lot of different modifications of signals, including demo ones, and as they are losing money, remove them and add others, while remaining afloat all the time?
That is exactly what they do.
 
revers45:
That is, taking into account the free publication, the seller can multiply the number of different modifications of signals, including demos, and as they fail, they can remove and add others, while remaining afloat all the time?
Well, it is a well known probability theory. The more signals, the higher the probability that one of them will stay afloat.
1...3456789101112131415
New comment