Interesting and Humour - page 3819
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Actually, we are not talking about light and heavy, but about natural (less harmful), artificial (more harmful) and surrogates (terribly harmful).
Actually they correlate.
Has the legalisation of natural drugs in a number of states led to a decrease in the use of artificial and surrogates?
Actually they are correlated.
Has the legalisation of natural drugs in a number of states led to a decrease in the use of artificial and surrogate drugs?
What do you think?
What do you think?
Do you support the drug legalisation scenario?
Do you support the drug legalisation scenario?
That's not what I mean, I don't understand what's wrong with weed and flowers?
That's not what I'm saying, I don't see what the grass and flowers have done wrong.
That's what I mean. I mean, that's the one.
ps are addictive and dependent.
You can eat poppy (without negative consequences), or you can turn it into a soft drug. Or a heavy one.
That's what I mean. I mean, that's what I mean.
ps are addictive and dependent.
Poppy can be eaten (without negative consequences), or it can be turned into a mild drug. Or a heavy one.
That's what you have to fight with addiction, not nature.
This is what we have to do to fight poppy addiction, not nature.
When poppies were banned, the number of junkies on the dachas dropped to zero.
There are different ways to fight it. The question is in whose interests this fight is, and whether it is a fight, or part of a cunning scenario in someone's private interests.
Remembering Stalin: pros and cons
Interestingly,the main motive for agreeing to the installation of attributes containing some kind of information about Stalin is the argument of respect for historical truth.Young people are the most vocal "for" on all issues, while among older people there is a clearer opposition to the installation of signs glorifying the former head of the USSR.
...
What kind of truth can we talk about if the topic is forbidden for discussion? Why even bring up topics that cannot be discussed?
You can smear the Soviet period, but you can't capitulate to VCIOM?