Errors, bugs, questions - page 1483
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't understand everything that has to do with reading data from graphical objects. Well, of course, it is necessary, but... If we develop, for example, an Expert Advisor based on Fibo levels, then what prevents us from once and for all creating a function that will calculate all other prices based on two known ones and store them in an array. In this case, the Expert Advisor can be tested and optimized, instead of running it through the visualizer, which of course is necessary... And if you always know only two prices - the upper and lower anchor points, you always know prices of all levels - of both standard fib and your own...
Yeah. But what if it's some kind of indicator that draws and the algorithm is unknown?
Yeah. What if it's some kind of indicator that draws and the algorithm is unknown?
Yeah. What if it's some kind of indicator that draws and the algorithm is unknown?
I asked if there's a built-in object get for that (there isn't, but there should be).
And this is a real tambourine dance.
A little simpler way is possible without wayUP
But that's really the only way.
And this is not tambourine dancing, but implementation of correct approach, that information should be synchronized minimum.
PS
And you can calculate price of ANY level you need. // For example the price of level 37%
This is nonsense, you were correctly written above, besides if you are writing an algorithm that has Fibo levels on a chart, how will it be unknown to you.
a little easier you can do it without wayUP
But this is really the only way.
And it's not a tambourine dance, it's the implementation of the right approach, that the information should synchronise as little as possible.
PS
And you yourself can calculate price of ANY level you need. // For example the price of 37% level.
Compared to one line ofObjectGetDouble(0, name_fibo, OBJPROP_PRICE,0.26);
it's even worse than dancing.
Compared to one lineObjectGetDouble(0, name_fibo, OBJPROP_PRICE,0.26);
this is even worse than dancing.
understand the developers. there are anchor points and there is a visual result.
Only the anchor points are guaranteed to be known to you - by pure chance, you call them 0% and 100%.
everything else is a visual result that the Metac Model cannot provide in the way you want.
It's not dancing and tambourine - it's ideology.
Play with the cards you have.
understand the developers. there are anchor points and there is a visual result.
you are only guaranteed to know the anchor points - by pure chance you call them 0% and 100%.
All the rest is a visual result that the meta-object model can not provide you in the form you want.
It's not dancing and tambourine - it's ideology.
Play with the cards you have.
:))) thanks
Can't provide because fibo lines are not objects on a chart?
Good afternoon
There is one broker with mt5.
and there's a CFD on oil
...
I don't know why I have such a tough time with this kind of problem.
I don't know how to fix the server side so that the helpline is not able to configure symbols incorrectly.
:))) thank you
Can't provide because fibo lines are not objects on a chart?
It can not, because this object is a Fibo line for you and only two anchor points and some algorithm of their processing for the terminal
---
You would look at other more complex objects like a spiral or a gannet. Well a metac can't give you everything you want.
Because there are only anchor points. Everything else is a picture.