Errors, bugs, questions - page 2115
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It seems that if you use the position comment as much as possible (31 characters) then there is no more room to display the ID in the tooltip.
Good afternoon!
Does anyone have an EA that sends frequent emails?
How many do you get per hour, per day?
I had 16 emails sent in 5 minutes and the log was empty for a few hours and then it started to write
Mail: not enough space for
Who has any experience on this subject.
P.S. Gmail google allows you to get emails every second , I assume that emails pile up faster in the terminal/server queue and are sent slower (how much ?)
And once again the advisor/terminal is trying to queue the email , and the queue is already full !!!
Good afternoon!
Does anyone have an EA that sends frequent emails?
How many do you get per hour, per day?
I had 16 emails sent in 5 minutes and the log was empty for a few hours and then it started to write
Mail: not enough space for
Who has any experience on this subject.
P.S. Gmail google allows you to get emails every second , I assume that emails pile up faster in the terminal/server queue and are sent slower (how much ?)
And once again the advisor/terminal is trying to queue the email , and the queue is already full !!!
why? they invented PUSH a long time ago
Error in the documentation
Error in the documentation
Thank you, we'll fix it.
I have repeatedly encountered discussion on the forum of users about MetaEditor's lack of a predefined macro similar to _WIN64. The administration's answer was that there is no need because MetaEditor generates universal 32-64-bit code at the same time.
At the same time, many people use the https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/225498/page2#comment_6401835 alignment by appending the fields to the structure
And indeed, if you use a ready-made .dll (which cannot be changed anymore), you cannot do without additional alignment. But in x86 and x64 this addition may look different, which means that the _WIN64 analog is still needed because the structure is defined at the stage of compiling .mq5 file where TerminalInfoInteger( TERMINAL_X64 ) does not work
Now we have to keep extra information in mind. As a result of saving on a trifle, there is a risk of getting an elusive error
Here is an example from the developers - GetOpenFileName which works in x64 and x86. See if it solves the issue
Here is an example from the developers - GetOpenFileName, which works in x64 and x86. See if it solves the issue
In fact, it requires almost twice as much code,
while programs with .dll are not for the mass segment
Again there must be a choice: Split (32\64) compilation and twice as much code
or universality and considerable code complication.
Besides, you may introduce the _WIN64 analogue according to the _IsX64 principle (it is not documented but you may use it)
An additional argument is that often there is only one .dll attached to a project (either x86 only or x64 only) and you cannot specify a line like this in the .mqh file of that project
For example here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/224745Example from help
Hence the question, how to change the fill inOBJ_RECTANGLE in mt 4 ???
Renat Fatkhullin:
Мы нацелены вообще скоро остановить разработки 32 битных версий Метатрейдера.
It is desirable to correct all known runtime errors at this point, e.g. this #1841289 https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1111/page2025#comment_5766707
The behaviour of this and other operators does not correspond to methods. While operator in relation to methods is nothing more than syntactic sugar