![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As for radio noise, I'm certainly not an expert in radio engineering, but the problem is solved by using a metal mesh frame with a smaller mesh size than the wavelength applied around the conductor. I think so, I can't remember anymore...
Nets can already write programmes
Nets can already write programmes
There is a big difference between what one is going to do and what one has already done). The guy is good, but to write software, the network has to think, and that is a long way off.
Visual programming can be done with voice control
And so:
It's all about transistors and their ability to retain residual charge. (This is what led to the development of all kinds of flash drives and programmable processors - which is what we're using now). So far, there are no candidates for the transistor replacement at all - except for the quantum one.
It should be understood that although the speed of electrons is low - but in the network we use the electromagnetic wave itself - which travels almost at the speed of light. In essence one task is done almost instantaneously - despite the number of transistors that are involved (really not far behind the speed of light). Much longer takes time to prepare and write new code - and a pause between these intervals, and even added bit rate means there is something like a pause between them too. But if you think what happens in the CPU - every instant there is a setting of current for transistors to perform a new task - and they change with an unreal frequency. The trick with the numbers (transistors) is to quickly rewrite your own code. And so far there is no analogue. There is only attempt to reduce number of rewrites by putting in once andy and setting high coefficients (but it is only for certain tasks and no more).
These are not the problems, the stability issues are bigger at this size. And the cost of the microcircuits.
It's all about transistors and their ability to retain residual charge. (This is what led to the development of all kinds of flash cards and programmable processors - which is what we are using now). So far, there are no candidates for the transistor replacement at all - except for the quantum one.
It should be understood that although the speed of electrons is low - but in the network we use the electromagnetic wave itself - which travels almost at the speed of light. In essence one task is done almost instantaneously - despite the number of transistors that are involved (really not far behind the speed of light). It takes much longer to prepare and write new code - and a pause between these intervals, and even added bit rate means there is something like a pause between them too. But if you think what happens in the processor - every instant it sets transistors for a new task - and they change with unreal frequency. The trick with the numbers (transistors) is to quickly rewrite your own code. And so far there is no analogue. There is only attempt to reduce number of rewrites by putting in once andi and setting high coefficients (but it is only for certain tasks and no more).
Visual programming can be done with voice control