Difference calculus, examples. - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yes, the indicators clearly have potential, spun a bit of genetics - this is the Si 2015-2018 M1.
Thanks for the participation and appreciation.
I have one of the "hung" "sport" targets:
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategy testing
Calling for fruitful cooperation on mutually beneficial terms
Aleksey Panfilov, 2017.01.31 08:02
Create a robot which on the history of at least 300 multi-directional trades on each of any two currency pairs, without martingale and with overshooting no more than (1 or 2 or n) opposite signals, gives a profit factor of at least for example THREE.
Thank you for your participation and appreciation.
I have one of the "hanging" "sport" targets:
I don't get it, on two instruments profit factor 3 with the same indicator settings, or is it about global?
I don't get it, on two instruments the profit factor 3 with the same indicator settings, or is it about global?
:)
First option.
P/S. The link didn't open.
:)
First option.
P/S. The link didn't open.
So I did not understand, is it necessary to get a profit factor of 3 when using two instruments simultaneously or on each separately?
And the link is automatic, to the MT5 help - off-topic in general.
I think you need to apply MO to achieve your goal and there will be such a result on tests and even better, but not much use on future data.
I have added an interval parameter to the indicator. At its value of 1, the indicator is fully consistent with the previous one.
But if we increase this parameter without recalculating the coefficients, we increase the leverage, and we see the dynamics of the indicator on higher timeframes.
Moreover, even if we recalculate the ratios, we cannot increase the leverage significantly due to their (ratio's) fast growth out of significance limits.
In the picture there are two indicators with interval 1 and interval 15.
I have added an interval parameter to the indicator. At its value of 1, the indicator is fully consistent with the previous one.
But if we increase this parameter without recalculating the coefficients, we increase leverage and see the dynamics of the indicator on higher timeframes.
The figure shows two indicators with interval 1 and interval 15.
I keep looking and looking at these screenshots...
Shade the whole chart with Fourier sine waves and it's done?
I keep looking and looking at these screenshots...
Shade the whole chart with Fourier sine waves and it's done?
)
A few threads on the Fourier forum certainly deserve it. )
)
A few threads on the Fourier forum certainly deserve it )
These threads didn't really make sense to me and drew the wrong conclusions
No one has tried to shift the waves by time
If the average EA lives 3 months, it is not the smallest wave that knocks it out
This is roughly the reasoning behind it...
These threads have not really been understood in my opinion and have drawn the wrong conclusions
No one has tried shifting the waves in time
If the average EA lives 3 months, it will not be knocked out by the smallest wave
That's about the same reasoning...
Yeah, probably need to experiment too.
Yes, I should probably experiment too.