1200 subscribers!!! - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ivan Butko:
I myself am a beginner in mql and I understand them better than anybody else, wishing to connect to Taras.) I'm going to try to conduct the signal myself, may be it will be a "success with the people".
Just out of curiosity, why exactly to Taras?
And why connect and not make your own?
Can you imagine if they take out the indicator line "Subscribers"?
That's where the honesty lies.
What a headache for beginners, they would have to study the figures, ask on the forum, spend time on it, compare and decide which figure is more important for them, decide "profit or drawdown? Do not discount it on the number of the crowd.
I myself am new to mql, and I understand them better than anyone, wanting to connect with Taras D)) But, I will try to lead the signal myself, maybe it will come out "people's success".
That's what I mean, many people don't want to "bother" with it. Here in the branch interesting and humor one of the moderators recently gave an example from the English-speaking part of the forum, where another moderator, for fun, created a branch, alya, I want money, but I do not want to think and do nothing.
I believe that in the Signals service on this site you can get a lot of subscribers by two methods:
1. Stable monthly profit 10-20% for 0.5-1 year. With a drawdown of less than 50% and an even upward curve of balance;
2. Fast increase of deposits for 2-3 months by 50-100%. With a drawdown of less than 80% and smooth rising curve of balance;
Both variants will find their "admirers". I've seen this kind of thing more than once. And I see it now.
So, go ahead, maybe 500+ is not far off.
But seriously, I already created mine. I will work on it. If all goes smoothly and successfully, I will create a topic in the future or an article "how to "take care" of his signal and how to promote it.
That's what I mean, many people don't want to "bother" with it. Here in the branch interesting and humor one of the moderators recently gave an example from the English-speaking part of the forum, where another moderator, for fun, created a branch, alya, I want money, but I do not want to think and do nothing.
I believe that in the Signals service on this site you can get a lot of subscribers by two methods:
1. Stable monthly profit 10-20% for 0.5-1 year. With a drawdown of less than 50% and an even upward curve of balance;
2. Fast increase of deposits for 2-3 months by 50-100%. With a drawdown of less than 80% and smooth rising curve of balance;
Both variants will find their "admirers". I've seen this kind of thing more than once. And I see it now.
So, go ahead, maybe your 500+ is not far off.
Thanks! I will definitely take it into account as a method
This was an unfortunate example -- read the posts above, already discussed:
Forum on Trading, Automated Trading Systems and Trading Strategy Testing
1200 subscribers!!!
Renat Fatkhullin, 2017.01.17 11:59
And you take a closer look at your signals, please.
Profitability is not the main factor. There are dozens of non-linear parameters in the ranking formula that give a balanced score.
For example, you didn't notice that you had a drawdown under 53%, which not many people would like. Always have a good eye on the Risks section.
-- so the example above with the 80% drawdown is a sure and fast way to the "failed signals" list
that was a bad example -- read the posts above, already discussed:
-- so the example above with 80% drawdown is a sure and fast way to the list of "failed signals"
Renat, do you see the crowd problem? Subscribers choose a signal with a large number of subscribers. How will you solve this non-competitive phenomenon?
Because if a subscriber faces a question of choosing from 10 (for example) top brands, he will choose the one which has more subscribers. And if they all have 5 stars, then the subscriber will start looking at quality metrics, which is fair.
Instead of stars, you can use a scale of completeness or something else (you have a fantasy), so that the user is not unconsciously confuse quantity and quality. After all, the forex ace with the best indicators three stars will seem low quality product.
Don't thank.
The same can be said about any TS. There are very decent scalpers in Signals. But it's worth it to make a move, as was the case with the franc, and they will sell out.
Black Swan acts indiscriminately. The 45% drawdown is BREXIT. That is, well, not a systemic, but force majeure drawdown. Profit is systematic, so well done, the author, unambiguously. If he achieves it through averaging, one can only wish him good luck. The approach "averaging is a way to failure, so I will not" is akin to the approach "trading - the game with negative sums, so I will not". Many ideas are in fact rejected, because they simply do not know how to "cook" them. For example, I haven't tried averaging. Probably wouldn't have worked, but until you try it, you won't know for sure.
"I don't believe" is a sketch of the service itself.
Is there such a stratum in the source code somewhere? Not stupid Ilan.
With indicators like mine, I should be at the top...:))) Well, no. That's how the rating is calculated? Give the way to the young and promising strangers ...